Is There an Absolute Time When Events Occur?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter goodensn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Events Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of absolute time and the ordering of events in the universe, particularly in the context of relativity. Participants explore whether there is an absolute time at which events occur, the implications of the finite speed of light, and the nature of simultaneity and causality in spacelike separated events.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the relativity of simultaneity is an illusion stemming from the finite speed of light, suggesting that events have a "true" time when they occur if observed from a distance of zero.
  • Others argue that time is measured by individuals with clocks and that there is no absolute clock for synchronization, emphasizing that simultaneity depends on the observer's frame of reference.
  • A participant suggests that while observers may disagree on the timing of events, there must be an absolute truth regarding the order of events, although this truth cannot be known without being everywhere at once.
  • Some participants clarify that for spacelike separated events, the temporal order may differ for different observers, which does not violate causality as these events cannot influence one another.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of spacelike separation, where some observers may perceive events in a different order, raising questions about the validity of their observations.
  • One participant acknowledges the complexity of the debate, noting that while observers may record events differently, it raises the question of whether one observer can be considered "wrong" in their measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express disagreement regarding the existence of absolute time and the ordering of events, with multiple competing views remaining unresolved throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of their arguments, particularly regarding the dependence on the observer's frame of reference and the implications of spacelike separation on the ordering of events.

  • #31
goodensn said:
If an observer witnesses an event (Event A) and is at distance of zero (d=0) from Event A, then that is the TRUE time the event occurred.

goodensn said:
but surely every event that happens in the Universe occurs at an absolute time (even though we may all disagree on when that time was).

goodensn said:
there must be an absolute truth on the order of events that occur throughout the universe.

goodensn said:
BUT...there still must be an absolute ordering of all events in the universe.
You keep saying this must be true without giving any reason why it must be true!

goodensn said:
I guess it is tempting to believe that there IS a true ordering of events even if observers disagree.
What is "tempting" is not always right!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
If the speed of light can be measured by us and we define the figure to this end
1760 yards = 1 mile
10 times the speed of light
17600 yards = 10 miles
some things can happen so fast A,B,C don't know ass from elbow
if things can be attributed a measurement then it follows multi pulls of said
item can be multiplied David Stuart Jones QED
 
  • #33
Well.. who would be right :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
638
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
824
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
331
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K