Is there an Entropy difference between a cold and hot body

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the entropy changes when two bodies at different temperatures, T_c (cold) and T_h (hot), are brought into contact until they reach thermal equilibrium. The total entropy of the system increases due to the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of an isolated system can never decrease. The participants also explore the concept of negative entropy changes, specifically in the context of heat transfer and work done, exemplified by the equation ΔS = -1000J/540K = -1.85J/K. This indicates that while the entropy of the hot body decreases, the overall system's entropy increases due to thermal conduction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of entropy and its calculations
  • Knowledge of heat transfer principles
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamic equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the entropy change formula ΔS = ∫(dQ_rev/T)
  • Learn about reversible and irreversible processes in thermodynamics
  • Explore the implications of the first law of thermodynamics on heat transfer
  • Investigate the concept of thermal equilibrium and its mathematical formulations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics, as well as engineers and researchers involved in heat transfer and energy systems.

  • #31
Mister T said:
Really? You can get all that from just the two initial temperatures? It makes no difference what the substances are, what their mass is, or what the final temperature is?
Of course you have to specify the masses and heat capacities of the two bodies. I think you must already have known that.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
Chestermiller said:
Of course you have to specify the masses and heat capacities of the two bodies. I think you must already have known that.

Of course I did, which is why I said that without that information you wouldn't have enough information. But you claimed I was wrong when I did that!
 
  • #33
annaphys said:
Ah so you mean an isochor and isotherm and do this continuously until the cold body reaches the final temperature?
I can't understand why you feel compelled to place labels on the processes we are dealing with here, such as adiabatic, isochoric, constant temperature, isothermal, etc. Please stop doing this. The reversible process to take either of these bodies from its initial thermodynamic equilibrium state to its final thermodynamic equilibrium state is not isothermal (since the system temperature is changing), and, for an incompressible solid, the term isochoric is redundant.

If you mean that, to get the body from the initial to the final state reversibly, we can put the body into sequential contact with a series of constant temperature reservoirs at slightly different temperatures, running monotonically from the initial temperature to the final temperature, then this is correct. Is that what you meant?
 
  • #34
Mister T said:
Of course I did, which is why I said that without that information you wouldn't have enough information. But you claimed I was wrong when I did that!
I was unable to read your mind. You certainly didn't mention what information, if any, was missing.
 
  • #35
Chestermiller said:
I was unable to read your mind. You certainly didn't mention what information, if any, was missing.

Huhh? Everything, except what is given, is missing.

Here is the OP's question:
annaphys said:
If two bodies, who say start with ##T_{cold}=T_c## and ##T_{hot}=T_h## and then they are brought in contact with one another and then after some time they both have the same temperature. What would be the entropy of the entire system?

My response was to state that there is not enough information given to answer that question.

Your response to me was to contradict that, so I followed up with a clarification and now you are agreeing with me.
 
  • #36
annaphys said:
Where does this equation exactly come from? Why would the internal energy be zero when there is internal energy in the system? The difference in the internal energy is zero but nonetheless there is internal energy.
The internal energy isn't zero; the CHANGE in internal energy is zero!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K