Is there anything more to forces than being mathematical machinery?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Mathematical
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
65 replies · 4K views
DrStupid said:
I usually refer to the original wording.
Not usually the best approach. The ideas have been polished and refined since Newton first stated them.
That means that forces are the only cause for changes in the state of motion of bodies. Frames of references are not even mentioned.
A more modern view is that cause and effect are irrelevant. If there is a change of momentum, there is a net force. If there is a net force, there is a change of momentum. The two concepts are not cause and effect -- they are more nearly synonymous. We adopt the definition that a "force" is a transfer of momentum and that an "inertial frame" is one in which Newton's first law holds good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and russ_watters
Physics news on Phys.org
vanhees71 said:
Then the 2nd Law says that the causes of changes of the state of motion (the deviation from rectilinear uniform motion) are forces,
That’s what I believe and have found that same expression expressed by some other well known physicists (including you).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Adesh said:
some other well known physicists

You mean Newton? He's pretty well known, I guess. :wink:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Adesh
etotheipi said:
You mean Newton? He's pretty well known, I guess. :wink:
Mr. Feynman, Mr. Arnold Sommerfeld and few others too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
DrStupid said:
According to N1 force is the cause and the change of motion the effect. How is this not a causality?
Science has ‘identified’ a common but rather slippery intermediate agency - a Force- which takes the place of all other real agencies: horses, falling water, a spring, a magnet etc.. The term Force allows us a common concept that can be treated a bit like money. We can earn money from many sources and spend it in many ways. Maths is what helps us deal with quantities involved. You could say that the causality is between the tennis player and the ball and the force just allows you to appreciate the quantities involved.
Our brains treat both forces and money as if they are real but they’re only in your head. I thing this justifies the OP and you can choose validly to look at things that way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Since the OP has been answered and this thread is now veering off into a repetition of a discussion that was previously closed it is time to close this thread also.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi