Is there anything wrong in this question statement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benjamin_harsh
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a mathematical question regarding the growth of an amount over time, specifically questioning the validity of a statement that claims an amount becomes 17 times the principal (P) in 8 years. The response highlights that the question lacks specificity, as various growth functions can satisfy the 8-year condition, leading to different outcomes at 15 years. It emphasizes the need for additional constraints, such as specifying a linear or exponential growth model, to arrive at a unique solution. The exponential growth model, represented by the equation P = P_0 e^{at}, is suggested as a more common approach for such problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential growth models, specifically P = P_0 e^{at}
  • Familiarity with mathematical functions and their properties
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations
  • Knowledge of growth rates and their implications over time
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of exponential growth models in real-world scenarios
  • Study linear versus exponential growth functions and their differences
  • Learn how to derive the rate constant a from given growth data
  • Explore mathematical problem-solving techniques for ambiguous questions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying growth models, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of different mathematical functions in problem-solving.

Benjamin_harsh
Messages
211
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
In 8 years, amount becomes 17 times of P. So in 15 years, amount becomes how much?
Relevant Equations
##\large \frac{8}{?} = \frac{17-1}{n_{2}-1} → \frac{8}{15} = \frac{16}{n-1} →\normalsize n = 31 \; times ##
In 8 years, amount becomes 17 times of P. So in 15 years, amount becomes how much?

A) This is the shortcut:

##\large \frac{8}{?} = \frac{17-1}{n_{2}-1} → \frac{8}{15} = \frac{16}{n-1} \normalsize → n = 31 \; times ##

Is there any wrong in this question statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question is too general to have a unique solution. There are many functions that meet your 8 year requirement that will have different results at 15 years. Perhaps you have left out some additional restrictions on the type of function (like it has to be linear, for example)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
As @DaveE says, it depends on what type of model you're studying and supposed to be applying. A more common model for growth is exponential, ##P = P_0 e^{at}## or ##P/P_0 = e^{at}## in which case you're expected to use the given value of ##P/P_0## first to solve for the rate constant ##a##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K