Is This Ellipse Equation Conversion Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsgal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    ellipses Homework
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of an ellipse equation into standard form. The original poster presents an equation of an ellipse and seeks validation of their conversion to standard form. Additionally, a related question about the properties of an elliptical pool table is introduced.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion process of the ellipse equation, with one asking to see the original poster's work. The original poster shares parts of their work but omits details. Another participant suggests a potential error in the original poster's simplification. The original poster then introduces a new question about the behavior of a pool ball on an elliptical table, expressing uncertainty about the next steps in their reasoning.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the ellipse equation conversion, with some participants questioning the accuracy of the original poster's work and offering insights. The second question regarding the elliptical pool table has also been raised, with participants providing some guidance but no clear consensus on the correctness of the original poster's approach.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's work is noted to be lengthy, and there are indications of potential confusion regarding the mathematical properties of ellipses, particularly in relation to the distances from the foci. The original poster also expresses uncertainty about their calculations and the implications of their findings.

physicsgal
Messages
164
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


an ellipse is represented by the equation:
x|^2 + 4y^2 - 4 x + 8y - 60 = 0

express the equation in standard form:
((x-2)^2 / 68) + ((y-4)^2/17) = 1

can anyone tell me if this is accurate? thanks

~Amy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That isn't what I'm getting. Can I see your work?
 
thanks!

i won't show all of it (half page long), but here's the main parts:

x^2 - 4x + 4y^2 + 8y = 60

(x^2 - 4X + 4) + (4(y^2 - 2y + 1) = 68
(i got the 68 by added 60 + 4 + 4(1))

~Amy
 
OK, I get:

[tex]\frac{(x-2)^2}{68}+\frac{(y+1)^2}{17}=1[/tex]

I think your mistake lies when you factored out that four and simplified, check your work.
 
Last edited:
thank you very much!

i have another quick question:
an elliptical pool table is 5m at its longest point, and 3m wide at its widest point. the pool table has two holes at the position of the foci.

so for the equation i have figured out:
x^2/6.25 + y^2/2.25 = 1.

and the foci are at (-1, 0), (1,0)
(im pretty sure all this is accurate, but anythings possible).

the question asks:
"if a pool ball is hit from one focus, it will bounce once and enter the hole at the other focus. will the ball always travel the same distance if it is hit from one focus? if so, what is the distance it will travel? prove your statement by selecting any point (except one of the vertices) on the edge of the pool table."
i know how to figure out how to get one of the points on the edge of the pool, but what next?

~Amy
 
Good work, ~Amy,
your solution must have been equivalent to:
[tex]% MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-<br /> % feqaeaartrvr0aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn<br /> % hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8srps0l<br /> % bbf9q8WrFfeuY-Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbba9q8WqFfea0-yr0R<br /> % Yxir-Jbba9q8aq0-yq-He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9Ff0dmeaabaqaciGa<br /> % caGaaeqabaaaamaaaOabaeqabaGaamiEamaaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaa<br /> % aakiabgkHiTiaaisdacaWG4bGaey4kaSIaaGinaiaadMhadaahaaWc<br /> % beqaaiaaikdaaaGccqGHRaWkcaaI4aGaamyEaiabgkHiTiaaiAdaca<br /> % aIWaGaeyypa0JaaGimaaqaaiaadIhadaahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaGc<br /> % cqGHsislcaaI0aGaamiEaiabgUcaRiaaisdadaqadaqaaiaadMhada<br /> % ahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaGccqGHRaWkcaaIYaGaamyEaaGaayjkaiaa<br /> % wMcaaiabgkHiTiaaiAdacaaIWaGaeyypa0JaaGimaaqaamaabmaaba<br /> % GaamiEamaaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaaaakiabgkHiTiaaisdacaWG4bGa<br /> % ey4kaSYaaeWaaeaacaaI0aGaai4laiaaikdaaiaawIcacaGLPaaada<br /> % ahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaaakiaawIcacaGLPaaacqGHsisldaqadaqa<br /> % aiaaisdacaGGVaGaaGOmaaGaayjkaiaawMcaamaaCaaaleqabaGaaG<br /> % OmaaaakiabgUcaRiaaisdadaqadaqaaiaadMhadaahaaWcbeqaaiaa<br /> % ikdaaaGccqGHRaWkcaaIYaGaamyEaiabgUcaRmaabmaabaGaaGOmai<br /> % aac+cacaaIYaaacaGLOaGaayzkaaWaaWbaaSqabeaacaaIYaaaaaGc<br /> % caGLOaGaayzkaaGaeyOeI0IaaGinamaabmaabaGaaGOmaiaac+caca<br /> % aIYaaacaGLOaGaayzkaaWaaWbaaSqabeaacaaIYaaaaOGaeyOeI0Ia<br /> % aGOnaiaaicdacqGH9aqpcaaIWaaabaWaaeWaaeaacaWG4bGaeyOeI0<br /> % IaaGOmaaGaayjkaiaawMcaamaaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaaaakiabgkHi<br /> % TiaaisdacqGHRaWkcaaI0aWaaeWaaeaacaWG5bGaey4kaSIaaGymaa<br /> % GaayjkaiaawMcaamaaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaaaakiabgkHiTiaaisda<br /> % cqGHsislcaaI2aGaaGimaiabg2da9iaaicdaaaaa!8D64!<br /> \[<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> x^2 - 4x + 4y^2 + 8y - 60 = 0 \\ <br /> x^2 - 4x + 4\left( {y^2 + 2y} \right) - 60 = 0 \\ <br /> \left( {x^2 - 4x + \left( {4/2} \right)^2 } \right) - \left( {4/2} \right)^2 + 4\left( {y^2 + 2y + \left( {2/2} \right)^2 } \right) - 4\left( {2/2} \right)^2 - 60 = 0 \\ <br /> \left( {x - 2} \right)^2 - 4 + 4\left( {y + 1} \right)^2 - 4 - 60 = 0 \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> \][/tex]
GO1 put his information up before I could.
 
I tried to post a solution process but the LaTex did not work (it used to work)
 
[tex]% MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-<br /> % feqaeaartrvr0aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn<br /> % hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8srps0l<br /> % bbf9q8WrFfeuY-Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbba9q8WqFfea0-yr0R<br /> % Yxir-Jbba9q8aq0-yq-He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9Ff0dmeaabaqaciGa<br /> % caGaaeqabaaaamaaaOabaeqabaGaamiEamaaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaa<br /> % aakiabgkHiTiaaisdacaWG4bGaey4kaSIaaGinaiaadMhadaahaaWc<br /> % beqaaiaaikdaaaGccqGHRaWkcaaI4aGaamyEaiabgkHiTiaaiAdaca<br /> % aIWaGaeyypa0JaaGimaaqaaiaadIhadaahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaGc<br /> % cqGHsislcaaI0aGaamiEaiabgUcaRiaaisdadaqadaqaaiaadMhada<br /> % ahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaGccqGHRaWkcaaIYaGaamyEaaGaayjkaiaa<br /> % wMcaaiabgkHiTiaaiAdacaaIWaGaeyypa0JaaGimaaqaamaabmaaba<br /> % GaamiEamaaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaaaakiabgkHiTiaaisdacaWG4bGa<br /> % ey4kaSYaaeWaaeaacaaI0aGaai4laiaaikdaaiaawIcacaGLPaaada<br /> % ahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaaakiaawIcacaGLPaaacqGHsisldaqadaqa<br /> % aiaaisdacaGGVaGaaGOmaaGaayjkaiaawMcaamaaCaaaleqabaGaaG<br /> % OmaaaakiabgUcaRiaaisdadaqadaqaaiaadMhadaahaaWcbeqaaiaa<br /> % ikdaaaGccqGHRaWkcaaIYaGaamyEaiabgUcaRmaabmaabaGaaGOmai<br /> % aac+cacaaIYaaacaGLOaGaayzkaaWaaWbaaSqabeaacaaIYaaaaaGc<br /> % caGLOaGaayzkaaGaeyOeI0IaaGinamaabmaabaGaaGOmaiaac+caca<br /> % aIYaaacaGLOaGaayzkaaWaaWbaaSqabeaacaaIYaaaaOGaeyOeI0Ia<br /> % aGOnaiaaicdacqGH9aqpcaaIWaaabaWaaeWaaeaacaWG4bGaeyOeI0<br /> % IaaGOmaaGaayjkaiaawMcaamaaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaaaakiabgkHi<br /> % TiaaisdacqGHRaWkcaaI0aWaaeWaaeaacaWG5bGaey4kaSIaaGymaa<br /> % GaayjkaiaawMcaamaaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaaaakiabgkHiTiaaisda<br /> % cqGHsislcaaI2aGaaGimaiabg2da9iaaicdaaaaa!8D64!<br /> $$<br /> \eqalign{<br /> & x^2 - 4x + 4y^2 + 8y - 60 = 0 \cr <br /> & x^2 - 4x + 4\left( {y^2 + 2y} \right) - 60 = 0 \cr <br /> & \left( {x^2 - 4x + \left( {4/2} \right)^2 } \right) - \left( {4/2} \right)^2 + 4\left( {y^2 + 2y + \left( {2/2} \right)^2 } \right) - 4\left( {2/2} \right)^2 - 60 = 0 \cr <br /> & \left( {x - 2} \right)^2 - 4 + 4\left( {y + 1} \right)^2 - 4 - 60 = 0 \cr} <br /> $$[/tex]
 
I'm not sure about this second question yet Amy, I'll work on it though.
 
  • #10
thanks for your help :o) talk to you tomorrow.

~Amy
 
  • #11
~Amy
For your post #5,
b^2 = a^2 - c^2

Yes, the ball will travel the same distance from one focus to the other nomatter from which direction it leaves the initial focus.
 
  • #12
I guess 2a=5 and 2b=3. So the equation pans out to [tex]\frac{x^2}{2.5^2}+\frac{y^2}{1.5}^2=1[/tex], and what they're asking for is that the sum of the distances from the foci... this is a constant, you can prove this by finding the distance of any arbitrary point from the two directrixes, and using the relation ps=e.pm, where s is the focus, and M is a point such that pm is perpendicular to the directrix... this works out to be 2ae, where e is the eccentricity of the ellipse.
 
  • #13
thanks chaoeverlasting, but i didnt quite understand everything you said.

here's what I've done:
if x = 1, y = 1.37 (1, 1.37)
foci (-2, 0), (2, 0)

d = *square root*(x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)2

( i do this for (1, 1.37) and (-2, 0). and then for (1, 1.37) and (2, 0))

= 3.30, and 1.70

but they should both equal the same thing.. does anyone see where i went wrong?

thanks

`Amy
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K