Is this Line Integral Independent of Path for a Conservative Field?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a line integral ∫ F . dr for the vector field F = (3x² sin y)i + (x³ cos y)j between the origin (0,0) and the point (2,4), specifically along two paths: a straight line y = 2x and a curve y = x². Participants are exploring whether the line integral is independent of the path taken, which relates to the concept of conservative fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the evaluation of the line integral along different paths and question the validity of using dr = dx i + dy j for a curve. There is also a consideration of whether the integral being reduced to a specific form implies path independence.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights regarding the independence of the integral from the path taken, suggesting that the field may be conservative due to its relation to a scalar potential. However, there remains a focus on clarifying the assumptions and definitions involved in the evaluation.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the relationship between x and y in the context of the paths taken, with concerns about treating them as independent variables during integration. Additionally, references to textbook guidance on the use of dr in different contexts are noted.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Evaluate this line integral ∫ F . dr , where F = (3x2 sin y)i + (x3 cos y)j between the origin (0,0) and the point (2,4):

(a) along straight line y = 2x
(b) along curve y = x2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)
dr = dx i + dy j

∫ [ (3x2 sin y) i + (x3 cos y)j ] . [dx i + dy j ]

= ∫ (3x2 sin y)dx + (x3 cos y)dy

= ∫ d(x3 sin y) from [0,0] to [2,4]Does this mean that this line integral is independent of the path taken?

(b) If the line integral is independent of path, you should get the same answer..

Does dr = dx i + dy j still hold given that it's a curve now? do i have to use the "distance along curve" formula:

dr = √[ 1 + (dy/dx)2 ] dxI've looked up RHB textbook it says it's fine to simply use dr = dx i + dy j ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:

Homework Statement



Evaluate this line integral ∫ F . dr , where F = (3x2 sin y)i + (x3 cos y)j between the origin (0,0) and the point (2,4):

(a) along straight line y = 2x
(b) along curve y = x2

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)
dr = dx i + dy j

∫ [ (3x2 sin y) i + (x3 cos y)j ] . [dx i + dy j ]

= ∫ (3x2 sin y)dx + (x3 cos y)dy

= ∫ d(x3 sin y) from [0,0] to [2,4]


Does this mean that this line integral is independent of the path taken?

(b) If the line integral is independent of path, you should get the same answer..

Does dr = dx i + dy j still hold given that it's a curve now? do i have to use the "distance along curve" formula:

dr = √[ 1 + (dy/dx)2 ] dx


I've looked up RHB textbook it says it's fine to simply use dr = dx i + dy j ...

x and y are not independent. You can't treat y as a constant when integrating dx and vice versa. Take your first path, y=2x. r=i dx+j dy=i dx+j 2*dx. Eliminate y from the integration by putting y=2x everywhere.
 
Dick said:
x and y are not independent. You can't treat y as a constant when integrating dx and vice versa. Take your first path, y=2x. r=i dx+j dy=i dx+j 2*dx. Eliminate y from the integration by putting y=2x everywhere.

I know x and y are not independent, as they are bounded by y = 2x...

But my question here is whether the integral is independent of the path taken or not since it can be reduced to ∫ d(x3 sin y)...
 
unscientific said:
I know x and y are not independent, as they are bounded by y = 2x...

But my question here is whether the integral is independent of the path taken or not since it can be reduced to ∫ d(x3 sin y)...

Yes it is.
 
unscientific said:
my question here is whether the integral is independent of the path taken or not since it can be reduced to ∫ d(x3 sin y)...
You can think of F as a field resulting from the scalar potential x3 sin y. Since that is single-valued, the field must be conservative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K