Is this math book enough for self-studying undergrad physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the adequacy of "Mathematical Tools for Physics" by James Nearing for self-studying undergraduate physics. Participants suggest that while the book covers a broad range of mathematical concepts, it functions more as a reference than a comprehensive learning resource. Recommendations include "Mathematical Methods for Physics" by Arfken, which is noted for its clarity and thoroughness. The consensus indicates that specialized texts are preferable for mastering each subject in depth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus and linear algebra
  • Familiarity with probability theory
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical methods in physics
  • Ability to navigate academic texts and reference materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "Mathematical Methods for Physics" by Arfken for a comprehensive understanding
  • Investigate additional specialized texts for calculus and linear algebra
  • Review online resources and lectures on mathematical methods in physics
  • Consider enrolling in a course that uses dedicated textbooks for each subject
USEFUL FOR

Students and self-learners in physics, educators seeking supplemental materials, and anyone looking to strengthen their mathematical foundation for physics applications.

DuctTapePro
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm talking about "Mathematical Tools for Physics by James Nearing".
https://www.amazon.com/dp/048648212X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

it seems it cover lots of math... but it feels like it's just a reference book..
will it be enough?
or should i get more specialized books to learn each subject thoroughly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not read that book.

Well, besides calculus, linear algebra and probability, I would recommend methametical methods for physics by Arfken. I think this book is easy to learn and it include almost all the skills you need master.
 
Books like this can be difficult to learn from. To cover all relevant math in one volume, they must move quickly and keep descriptions and words to a minimum. You can try it, but there’s a reason most students take courses with a text dedicated to the subject.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint

Similar threads

Studying Is the suggestion for self-learning mathematics from books wrong?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Is this a good self-study program?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Studying How to self study Physics and Mathematics
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Studying How to self-study physics past High School Level?
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
Recommendations for study materials to prepare for undergrad Physics
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Studying Looking for a thread discussing ideal math classes for physics major
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Self Learning Math/Physics
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
Other How to self study mathematics for the sake of the subject?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Studying Chemistry or physics - which one is more suitable for self-studying?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Studying Advice on self studying material
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K