Is this sequence arithmetic, geometric, or neither?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the sequence \(\frac{1}{1}, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{4}, \ldots, \frac{1}{n}\) is arithmetic, geometric, or neither. The original poster explores the definitions and properties of sequences, particularly focusing on common differences and common ratios.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the sequence by calculating common differences and common ratios, concluding that it is neither arithmetic nor geometric. Some participants introduce the concept of harmonic sequences and question the notation used for summation.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the nature of the sequence and correct notation errors. Participants are exploring different interpretations of the sequence and its representation, with some guidance provided regarding the correct use of sigma notation.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the notation for sequences and series, as well as the potential misinterpretation of mathematical expressions. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the appropriate categorization of the topic within the forum.

Lebombo
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the sequence \frac{1}{1}, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3} , \frac{1}{4}...\frac{1}{n} arithmetic or geometric?

Homework Equations



Common difference and Common ratio formulas

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the common difference from a_{2} - a_{1} =d_{1} and common difference from a_{3} - a_{2} =d_{2}. Since d_{1}≠ d_{2} , then this sequence is not arithmetic.

I did the same thing for the common ratio and found r_{1}≠ r_{2}. So this sequence is not geometric either.

It is simply a sequence defined by the sigma notation \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{n}P.S. I found these topics in an Algebra book, but the topic of sequences and series are also present in my calculus book. To moderators, free to move this to the Algebra section if it's felt that this topic would fit better there.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Much appreciated.
 
Lebombo said:
It is simply a sequence defined by the sigma notation \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{n}

Your expression is incorrect. It should be

$$\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k}.$$

The variable ##k## is what is being summed over, so it must appear in the sum. Here, n is the upper limit.

As written, \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{n} is interpreted as ##\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^n 1 = \frac{1}{n}n = 1##.

You made a similar mistake when writing the sum in your other thread. Be careful, otherwise your equations could easily be misinterpreted.
 
Thanks, although I'm still not 100% proficient on the sigma notation, that was a definite typo as opposed to not having the knowledge in a previous thread. Appreciate the correction.
 
\sum_{k=1}\frac{1}{k}
is a series. You said this was a sequence which would be denoted as
\left\{\frac{1}{k}\right\}_{k=1}^n
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K