Is This the End of the Gaza War?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ongoing Gaza conflict, exploring the potential for escalation or resolution. Participants express varying opinions on the likelihood of an end to hostilities, the nature of warfare, and the humanitarian implications for civilians involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants speculate that the current situation could lead to a significant escalation, while others express skepticism about the desire for an all-out war from either side.
  • There are differing views on what might de-escalate tensions, with suggestions including intervention from Egypt.
  • Concerns are raised about civilian casualties, with participants discussing the actions of Hamas and Israel regarding civilian safety and targeting.
  • Some participants argue that the rockets fired from Gaza are largely ineffective due to Israel's Iron Dome defense system, while others emphasize the psychological impact of such attacks.
  • There is a discussion about the historical context of the conflict, with references to previous wars and the current scale of casualties.
  • Participants express differing opinions on the moral implications of the conflict, questioning the definitions of terrorism and civilian status in the context of warfare.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the potential outcomes of the conflict, with multiple competing views on the likelihood of escalation, the effectiveness of military actions, and the humanitarian impact on civilians.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on historical context and personal experiences, which may not be universally applicable. The discussion includes references to specific incidents and media portrayals that are contested by participants.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the dynamics of the Gaza conflict, humanitarian issues in warfare, and the complexities of international relations may find this discussion relevant.

  • #31
arildno said:
1. "The question of who began what is insoluble"
No, it is perfectly soluble. It began by the evil culture fostered by men like Haj-Amin al-Husseini, orchestrating massacres on peacefully, legitimately settled Jews back in the 1920s That evil policy of terror intensified during the 1930s and 1940s.

2. " We're talking about the oldest conflict on the planet where the two protagonists denied the other's right to exist as a nation."
Incorrect. Israel has NEVER denied the other part the right to exist as a nation. That is SOLELY the position of the Palestinians and fellow Arab governments.

1. That's why your buddies are retaliating since 48 ?
2. Say that to Benny, please...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
nazarbaz said:
The question of who began what is insoluble, Russ. I'm not going into this and I'm not talking about the recent outburst. But to say that the humantarian situation is mostly, more or less, to that extent or the other, the palestinians fault is simply not acceptable. We're talking about the oldest conflict on the planet where the two protagonists denied the other's right to exist as a nation. No one is good or evil, no one is responsible for it. The situation went wrong from the very beginning as everyone acted according it's own interests.
You can't ask palestinians to accept any peace process unleashed by the other part, it's not fair. And you can't blame them for resisting the logic of the most powerful.
Several issues here:

1. I'm not talking about who began what, nor the age of the conflict. That's pointless and rightly banned from this thread by the moderator of this forum. I'm talking about who is keeping it going. As such:
2. Currently, only one side denies the right of the other to exist.
3. Currently, only one side would accpet an immediate and unconditional end to hostility.
4. As a result, one side -- the side that is being harmed the most by the war -- can easily and immediately choose to end the fighting, immediately improving their lives. The other cannot.
 
  • #33
nazarbaz said:
2. Say that to Benny, please...
Please explain and provide a source.
 
  • #34
What I heard stated once, and it seems to me to be an interesting take on the whole situation is this

Israelis work together and have turned a desert into a garden. The Palestinians fight among themselves and with others and have turned a desert into a wasteland.

This is a bit metaphorical, but seems accurate to me.
 
  • #35
russ_watters said:
Several issues here:

1. I'm not talking about who began what, nor the age of the conflict. That's pointless and rightly banned from this thread by the moderator of this forum. I'm talking about who is keeping it going. As such:
2. Currently, only one side denies the right of the other to exist.
3. Currently, only one side would accpet an immediate end to hostility.
4. As a result, one side -- the side that is being harmed the most by the war -- can easily and immediately choose to end the fighting, immediately improving their lives. The other cannot.

I'm sorry but it's not pointless. You can't have any grasp on what is happening if you ignore the historical framework.
Are you serious about these claims ? Palestinians have to accept whatever the israelis want to offer ? You call this a fair peace process ? Palestinians tried the peaceful way and it failed... It's not reasonable to consider them guilty of the oppression they live...
 
  • #36
And this is why this topic is banned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 364 ·
13
Replies
364
Views
28K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
6K