Is This the End of the Gaza War?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the ongoing Gaza conflict, with participants expressing skepticism about the likelihood of a resolution. Key points include the role of Egypt in potential peace negotiations and the historical context of previous Gaza Wars, particularly the 2009 conflict. Participants highlight the asymmetrical nature of warfare, with Israel's Iron Dome significantly mitigating the impact of Gaza's rocket attacks. The discussion also touches on the humanitarian implications, emphasizing the need for a ceasefire and the complexities surrounding civilian casualties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Gaza conflict and its historical context
  • Familiarity with military strategies, particularly asymmetrical warfare
  • Knowledge of the Iron Dome defense system and its operational capabilities
  • Awareness of international relations, particularly Egypt's role in Middle Eastern diplomacy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical timeline of the Gaza Wars, focusing on the 2009 conflict
  • Study the operational effectiveness of the Iron Dome missile defense system
  • Examine Egypt's diplomatic strategies in mediating Middle Eastern conflicts
  • Explore the implications of asymmetrical warfare on civilian populations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for political analysts, conflict resolution specialists, humanitarian workers, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of the Gaza conflict and its broader implications on regional stability.

  • #31
arildno said:
1. "The question of who began what is insoluble"
No, it is perfectly soluble. It began by the evil culture fostered by men like Haj-Amin al-Husseini, orchestrating massacres on peacefully, legitimately settled Jews back in the 1920s That evil policy of terror intensified during the 1930s and 1940s.

2. " We're talking about the oldest conflict on the planet where the two protagonists denied the other's right to exist as a nation."
Incorrect. Israel has NEVER denied the other part the right to exist as a nation. That is SOLELY the position of the Palestinians and fellow Arab governments.

1. That's why your buddies are retaliating since 48 ?
2. Say that to Benny, please...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
nazarbaz said:
The question of who began what is insoluble, Russ. I'm not going into this and I'm not talking about the recent outburst. But to say that the humantarian situation is mostly, more or less, to that extent or the other, the palestinians fault is simply not acceptable. We're talking about the oldest conflict on the planet where the two protagonists denied the other's right to exist as a nation. No one is good or evil, no one is responsible for it. The situation went wrong from the very beginning as everyone acted according it's own interests.
You can't ask palestinians to accept any peace process unleashed by the other part, it's not fair. And you can't blame them for resisting the logic of the most powerful.
Several issues here:

1. I'm not talking about who began what, nor the age of the conflict. That's pointless and rightly banned from this thread by the moderator of this forum. I'm talking about who is keeping it going. As such:
2. Currently, only one side denies the right of the other to exist.
3. Currently, only one side would accpet an immediate and unconditional end to hostility.
4. As a result, one side -- the side that is being harmed the most by the war -- can easily and immediately choose to end the fighting, immediately improving their lives. The other cannot.
 
  • #33
nazarbaz said:
2. Say that to Benny, please...
Please explain and provide a source.
 
  • #34
What I heard stated once, and it seems to me to be an interesting take on the whole situation is this

Israelis work together and have turned a desert into a garden. The Palestinians fight among themselves and with others and have turned a desert into a wasteland.

This is a bit metaphorical, but seems accurate to me.
 
  • #35
russ_watters said:
Several issues here:

1. I'm not talking about who began what, nor the age of the conflict. That's pointless and rightly banned from this thread by the moderator of this forum. I'm talking about who is keeping it going. As such:
2. Currently, only one side denies the right of the other to exist.
3. Currently, only one side would accpet an immediate end to hostility.
4. As a result, one side -- the side that is being harmed the most by the war -- can easily and immediately choose to end the fighting, immediately improving their lives. The other cannot.

I'm sorry but it's not pointless. You can't have any grasp on what is happening if you ignore the historical framework.
Are you serious about these claims ? Palestinians have to accept whatever the israelis want to offer ? You call this a fair peace process ? Palestinians tried the peaceful way and it failed... It's not reasonable to consider them guilty of the oppression they live...
 
  • #36
And this is why this topic is banned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 364 ·
13
Replies
364
Views
28K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K