Is Time Just Another Coordinate Axis That We Can Only See Moving Forward?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sqljunkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Speed Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the nature of time as a coordinate axis, questioning whether it can be traversed in both directions and at varying speeds, similar to spatial dimensions. Participants consider implications of this view in the context of physics principles and human perception of time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that time might be treated as just another coordinate axis, suggesting the possibility of moving freely in both directions.
  • Others argue that, while time is treated as a coordinate in physics, humans can only perceive it moving forward and cannot move backwards along it.
  • A participant questions how one might test the idea of moving backwards in time, indicating skepticism about the premise.
  • Some participants reference principles like least action and least time, discussing whether these imply limitations on moving backwards or faster than light in time.
  • There are conflicting views on whether particles can move backwards in time, with some asserting that they cannot and others suggesting that the premise may be flawed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of time and its properties, with no consensus reached on whether time can be traversed backwards or at varying speeds.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding time's properties based on human perception and the constraints of physical laws, but these remain unresolved within the discussion.

sqljunkey
Messages
183
Reaction score
8
Is it possible that time is just another coordinate axis? That it can be moved freely into backwards and forwards at any speed. And for some reason we as humans can only see it moving forward? and communicate at a definite speed in time.

Maybe everything is already calculated and solved, and we are just moving through the steps. If that is so is there anyway to find out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sqljunkey said:
Is it possible that time is just another coordinate axis?

This is how it is treated in physics...

sqljunkey said:
That it can be moved freely into backwards and forwards at any speed.

... except that you can't move backwards along it. Also note that your own 'speed' through time never ever changes. If you keep a clock with you at all times, it will always tick at 1 second per second. You will only ever observe clocks not in your frame of reference ticking at some other rate.

sqljunkey said:
And for some reason we as humans can only see it moving forward? and communicate at a definite speed in time.

If we can only observe it moving forward, that would seem to preclude us ever observing it doing anything else. :wink:
 
sqljunkey said:
Is it possible that time is just another coordinate axis?
Time IS "just another coordinate". Actually, I thing the term "dimension" is more appropriate
That it can be moved freely into backwards and forwards at any speed.
no, you can only move forward in time.
And for some reason we as humans can only see it moving forward? and communicate at a definite speed in time.
How would you test for that?EDIT: I see Drakkith beat me to it.
 
What about principles like least action and least time, where particles take non-straight paths to a point. Doesn't that imply that we can't move backwards or at higher than c in time, but particles can and do ?
 
sqljunkey said:
What about principles like least action and least time, where particles take non-straight paths to a point. Doesn't that imply that we can't move backwards or at higher than c in time, but particles can and do ?
Well, since they CAN'T and DON'T, don't you think your premise is probably wrong?
 
sqljunkey said:
What about principles like least action and least time, where particles take non-straight paths to a point. Doesn't that imply that we can't move backwards or at higher than c in time, but particles can and do ?

No. Remember that we ourselves are made out of particles and follow identical rules in the right circumstances.
 
sqljunkey said:
where particles take non-straight paths to a point.
And that's without using Sat Nav!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K