Is total flux linkage λ=dΨ*Ienclosed/I or λ=N*Ψ?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the application of flux linkage formulas for coaxial cables and solenoids. The formula dλ=dΨ * Ienclosed/I is used for coaxial cables, while λ=N*Ψ is appropriate for solenoids. The difference arises from the orientation of current flow and magnetic fields in each configuration, which affects the calculations of flux linkage. It is emphasized that understanding the definitions of Ienclosed and I is crucial for accurate calculations. The key takeaway is that different geometries require distinct approaches to determine total flux linkage.
ElieMakdissi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Calculate the flux linkage inside a coaxial cable
Relevant Equations
total flux linkage λ=dΨ*Ienclosed/I or λ=N*Ψ
In Sadiku, he used the formula dλ=dΨ * Ienclosed/I
to determine the total flux linkage for coaxial cable for ρ<a and for a<ρ<b, but I applied this formula for the solenoid and it didn't work, the way that works for the solenoid is by using λ=N*Ψ.

So why we multiply by Ienclosed/I in the coaxial cable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ElieMakdissi said:
Homework Statement: Calculate the flux linkage inside a coaxial cable
Relevant Equations: total flux linkage λ=dΨ*Ienclosed/I or λ=N*Ψ

In Sadiku, he used the formula dλ=dΨ * Ienclosed/I
to determine the total flux linkage for coaxial cable for ρ<a and for a<ρ<b, but I applied this formula for the solenoid and it didn't work, the way that works for the solenoid is by using λ=N*Ψ.

So why we multiply by Ienclosed/I in the coaxial cable?
I’m guessing (don’t have the textbook), but maybe this helps…

In a (long) solenoid, the direction of current-flow is around the axis; the direction of the internal magnetic field is parallel to the axis. The opposite applies in a coaxial cable. So you can’t apply results/equations for a solenoid to a coaxial cable. Differently oriented areas are needed when calculating fluxes.

Make sure you know exactly what ##l_{enclosed}## and ##l## represent.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...