Undergrad Is Transverse Strain Zero at the Bolts of a Clamped Circular Membrane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chrono G. Xay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strain Transverse
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the assumption that transverse strain at the bolts of a clamped circular membrane is zero. The author initially visualized the rim's shape between bolts as a catenary curve but later proposed a static amplitude modulating function instead. A mathematical expression for this function is provided, suggesting a relationship in cylindrical coordinates. The valleys in the graph represent the bolts' positions, while the peaks indicate the transverse strain of the rim. Overall, the exploration aims to clarify the mechanics of strain distribution in the membrane system.
Chrono G. Xay
Messages
91
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I’m trying to do some analysis of an acoustic drum at rest. In an earlier thread of mine I was getting some help verifying the equation for axisymmetric surface tension of a circular membrane. The starting point I chose assumed that the transverse strain of the clamping annulus was either zero or considered negligible. This next analysis assumes the opposite.
The annulus (“rim”) clamping the circular membrane over its cylindrical shell has a number of bolts ‘n’ positioned equidistantly around its perimeter. I’m guessing that the amount of transverse strain at those bolts would be where we might reasonably assume to be zero.

When I was first trying to imagine what general shape the rim would take between any two neighboring bolts I thought of a catenary curve. However, as time went on that made less and less sense. As I kept poking around with a graphing calculator, what seemed to make more sense is something probably akin to a sort of… ‘static’ (my word) amplitude modulating function. Here’s an example of what I’m talking about (in Cartesian coordinates): $$y_1(x) = \frac{a^{-1}\left|{0.5\left[a - sin\left({nπx + \frac π 2 }\right)\right]} \right| sin\left({nπx + \frac π 2}\right)-0.5\left(a-1\right)} b$$
Where ##a ≥ 2## and ##b > 0##.

I’m guessing that a parametrized graph of this line in cylindrical coordinates would be something like… ##r = n, z=y_1(θ)##? Did I use that word correctly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here’s a screenshot of the graphed function (very slightly altered- LaTex below), where ##n = 6##, ##a = 3##, and ##b = 5##:

$$y_1(x) = \frac{\left|{0.5\left[a - sin\left({nπx + \frac π 2 }\right)\right]} \right| sin\left({nπx + \frac π 2}\right)+\left(a-1\right)} {ab}$$
Where ##a ≥ 2## and ##b > 0##.

View attachment 340565

For the sake of clarity: The valleys of the graph indicate the locations of the bolts pulling down on the annulus (“rim”), which pulls the circular membrane taught across the opening of the open-ended cylindrical shell. The peaks then are the transverse strain of the rim.
 
The picture I uploaded is giving me errors. Let me try that again…
IMG_7135.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
29K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K