Is Uniform Convergence Implying Boundedness of the Limit Function?

Click For Summary
Uniform convergence of a sequence of functions (fn) to a limit function f does not necessarily imply that f is bounded, even if each fn is bounded. The key point is that uniform convergence ensures that the difference between fn and f can be made arbitrarily small, but it does not restrict the behavior of f itself. A counterexample can illustrate this: if fn converges uniformly to a function that diverges, then f can be unbounded despite all fn being bounded. Thus, uniform convergence does not guarantee the boundedness of the limit function. Understanding this relationship is crucial in analysis.
dracond
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Just trying to get feel for uniform convergence and it's relationship to boundedness. If a sequence of functions (fn) converges uniformly to f and (fn) is a sequence of bounded functions, is f also bounded?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the convergence is uniform then for all e there is an N such that |fn(x)-f(x)|<e for all n>=N. If fN is bounded and f unbounded, how can this be?
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K