Is Vm a reliable measure of magnetic fields in the presence of current?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the reliability of the magnetic scalar potential Vm as a measure of magnetic fields in the presence of current. It is established that when there is no current density, the magnetic field B can be expressed as B = -Mu0*grad(Vm) due to curl(B) = 0. However, in regions with non-zero current density, Vm becomes path-dependent and includes an arbitrary constant, which complicates its use. Ultimately, while Vm can still be utilized for differentiation, it fails to accurately describe magnetic fields where current is present.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and potentials
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically curl and gradient operations
  • Knowledge of Maxwell's equations, particularly in relation to magnetic fields
  • Basic concepts of current density and its effects on magnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of curl(B) in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the relationship between magnetic scalar potential and current density
  • Learn about the conditions under which magnetic fields can be considered conservative
  • Investigate alternative methods for calculating magnetic fields in the presence of currents
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in the behavior of magnetic fields in relation to current density.

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
I'm confused about the status of Vm. We are asked under what circumstances we can write B = - Mu0*grad(Vm).
I think the idea is that when there is no current density (displacement or conduction) we can write curl(B) = 0. Therefore we can write B as a grad of a scalar potential, as curl grad = 0 always. The only problem is that even if curl B isn't zero, all this means is that B is not a conservative field, so that Vm isn't path independent i.e it is not well defined. this just means that if we find Vm using different paths we get different values of Vm which differ by a constant, therefore Vm includes an arbitrary constant. the only problem is that this constant disappears on differentiation anyway, so surely we can still write B = -Mu0*grad (Vm) even when there is a current density? thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is that if [tex]V_m[/tex] is a well behaved function then [tex]\nabla \times (\nabla V_m) = 0[/tex] so that the magnetic scalar potential cannot describe a magnetic field in regions where current is nonzero.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K