Is Water or Ice better for dissipating heat from a copper tube

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of using water mixed with antifreeze versus ice for cooling air flowing through a copper tube inside a chest freezer. Participants explore the thermal properties of liquids versus solids, the design of the cooling system, and practical considerations for achieving the desired air temperature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a liquid coolant will perform better than a solid, citing examples of heat transfer efficiency.
  • One participant questions the reasoning behind the preference for liquids, noting that ice has a higher thermal conductivity than water and asks if this affects cooling performance.
  • There are considerations regarding the flow rate of air and the continuous operation of the cooling system, with suggestions to optimize the design for better heat transfer.
  • Some participants propose using a longer length of coiled copper tubing or a finned heat exchanger to enhance cooling efficiency.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for air gaps forming if ice melts around the copper tube, which could impede thermal transfer.
  • One participant suggests utilizing the existing evaporator in the freezer for direct air cooling, presenting a more integrated approach to the cooling system.
  • The original poster shares their plan to use a mixture of antifreeze and water in the copper tubing and test its effectiveness after cooling.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that liquids are more effective than solids for cooling, but there is disagreement regarding the specific thermal properties and practical implications of using ice versus a liquid coolant. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal cooling method and design.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the impact of flow rate on cooling efficiency and the potential for thermal transfer issues due to air gaps. There are also unresolved questions about the adequacy of the proposed copper coil length for continuous cooling.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in thermal management, cooling system design, and practical applications of heat transfer principles in experimental setups.

tilopa
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am running hot air through a copper tube that is inside a chest freezer. I would like to encase the copper tube in a coolant that will help cool the air in the tube and was wondering which of these 2 would work better, water mixed with antifreeze at a temperature of 0 degrees F, or Ice at 0 F?

Thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
A liquid will do much better than a granular solid.

For instance, immersing your hand in an ice slush will chill it much more rapidly than sticking it into a bin of ice cubes.

As another example, dry ice in acetone chills much better than dry ice alone.
 
I assume you need a a supply of cold air for some purpose.
As jbriggs444 mentioned, to quote, a liquid will do much better than a granular solid.

Your choice on how to cool the air depends upon what flowrate of air required, and is it continious or intermitant?

You do realize that the antifreeze solution will increase in temperature as the hot ar transfers heat to it. If your flowrate of air is large enough you will after a passage of time not get air as cold as your requirements demand. You need to take into account whether or not the transfer of heat from the coolant enclosure to the chest freezer will be quick enough.

Have you thought of just adding a longer length of coiled tube within the chest freezer, or perhaps passing the air through a finned heat exchanger of suitable size.
 
jbriggs444 said:
A liquid will do much better than a granular solid.

I am wondering why that is so. Solids have a higher Thermal Conductivity that liquids in general, ice has a TC of 2.1 and water is .5 something, my understanding is that means ice can transfer the heat from molecule to molecule much faster. Like Copper has a thermal conductivity of about 385, that is why it is so good at dissipating heat, no? The higher the TC the faster it can transfer heat. I am not merely concerned about how cold it feels on my skin because the ice and water in my example will be at the same temperature. Am I missing something here?

256bits said:
Your choice on how to cool the air depends upon what flowrate of air required, and is it continious or intermitant?

This will be a continuous operation, the air will flow through the copper at 3.2 Liters/sec. The coolant will be constantly cooled by the freezer which is plugged into the outlet.

256bits said:
Have you thought of just adding a longer length of coiled tube within the chest freezer, or perhaps passing the air through a finned heat exchanger of suitable size.

I am trying to determine how long the copper coil would need to be to cool the air in a continual operation. I am starting with 3 50 foot coils of 3/8 OD copper (about 1/4 inside diameter) but I am not sure that will be enough. Any thoughts on that?

Thanks.
 
jbriggs444 said:
A liquid will do much better than a granular solid.

For instance, immersing your hand in an ice slush will chill it much more rapidly than sticking it into a bin of ice cubes.

BTW, the main reason your hand feels colder in your example is because more of the surface area of your hand is in contact with the coolant (ice slush) than with sticking it in ice cubes. I am talking about copper coils encased in a block of ice, so all of the surface area of the copper will be in contact with ice.
 
tilopa said:
BTW, the main reason your hand feels colder in your example is because more of the surface area of your hand is in contact with the coolant (ice slush) than with sticking it in ice cubes. I am talking about copper coils encased in a block of ice, so all of the surface area of the copper will be in contact with ice.

that's exactly why a liquid will be better at cooling the air then a solid. surface area for thermal conductivity. better than a tube would be a capillary type finned heat exchanger, oil cooler etc.. the large surface area will increase the efficiency of heat conduction.

a block of ice will melt where the tube contacts it and then it'll have an air gap that would then insulate the tube and reduce the conductive thermal transfer as it's now being handled by still air.
 
The freezer is already designed to cool air as that is the typical medium for heat transfer from stored food to refrigerant. You could dismantle the freezer to obtain the working parts, then direct your air through the evaporator. If you don't want to dismantle the freezer you could find the evaporator inlet and outlet. Run your inlet tube to the evaporator inlet and leave it open. Place the open end of your outlet tube either at the evaporator outlet or near the center of the freezer, away from walls which will conduct heat inward. As you pump air into the freezer it will be directly cooled by the freezers evaporator. Pressure in the freezer will build and begin pushing air out the outlet tube at the same rate that you are pushing it in.
 
Thanks for all the info.

Mrspeedy, your idea sounds good, but it is a little bit involved for me right now, if my plan does not work I'll try your method. I've bought 50 feet of 3/8 copper refrigerator tubing, bent it into a coil and drilled holes at the top of the freezer and pushed the tubing through. I'm then going to full the freezer with 25% anti-freeze and 75% water and let it cool to as low as it will go in my freezer. Then pump air in through the copper and see how cool it comes out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K