Isolating C from "L=2C+∏ (D+d)/2 + (D-d)^2/4C" - Help Needed!

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wallybanger
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around isolating the variable C in the equation for calculating belt length based on pulley sizes and the distance between their centers. Participants are exploring algebraic manipulation and the application of the quadratic formula to reformulate the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in isolating C from the equation L=2C+∏ (D+d)/2 + (D-d)^2/4C.
  • Another suggests multiplying through by C to form a quadratic equation in C.
  • A participant questions the multiplication process, specifically regarding the treatment of terms in the equation.
  • Clarifications are provided about how multiplying by C affects the equation, particularly regarding terms in the denominator.
  • Some participants discuss the quadratic formula as a method to solve the resulting equation.
  • There is a suggestion to use lowercase π for clarity in notation.
  • Participants express uncertainty about factoring and the implications of multiplying by C.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach of multiplying by C to form a quadratic equation, but there is some confusion regarding the treatment of terms and the multiplication process. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to isolate C and the participants' comfort with the algebra involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express limitations in their algebra skills, indicating a need for further review of foundational concepts. There are unresolved questions about the manipulation of terms and the application of the quadratic formula.

wallybanger
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm not the best with algebra and I've been wrestling with a formula this afternoon. It is a formula to calculate a belt length based on 2 pulley sizes and the distance between the centres. I would like to be able to calculate the distance between the centres based on the pulley sizes and the belt length so instead of solving for L I need to solve for C. I would love to know what I'm doing wrong in isolating C. Anyway, here is the eqn.

L=2C+∏ (D+d)/2 + (D-d)^2/4C

L= Belt length
C= Distance between pulley centres
D= Big pulley Dia
d= Small pulley Dia

Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Multiply through by C. You then have a quadratic in C, which is readily solvable.
 
mathman said:
Multiply through by C. You then have a quadratic in C, which is readily solvable.
I kinda know what you mean but I'm not really sure how to do that. As in multiply every element by c? Top and bottom of the fractions?
 
Multiplying both sides of
[tex]L=2C+∏ (D+d)/2 + (D-d)^2/4C[/tex]
by C will give
[tex]LC= 2C^2+ ∏ C(D+ d)/2+ (D- d)^2/4[/tex]
 
For anybody still hung up on this, the next step is to reformulate the equation using the quadratic equation.
 
Ok, looking good so far, but how come the second part (D-d)^2/4 isn't also multiplied by C and why are the denominators not multiplied by C?

Ugh, I also suck at factoring. I need to go through my algebra textbook again and teach myself all this stuff from scratch.
 
wallybanger said:
Hi, I'm not the best with algebra and I've been wrestling with a formula this afternoon. It is a formula to calculate a belt length based on 2 pulley sizes and the distance between the centres. I would like to be able to calculate the distance between the centres based on the pulley sizes and the belt length so instead of solving for L I need to solve for C. I would love to know what I'm doing wrong in isolating C. Anyway, here is the eqn.

L=2C+∏ (D+d)/2 + (D-d)^2/4C

L= Belt length
C= Distance between pulley centres
D= Big pulley Dia
d= Small pulley Dia

Thanks :)

Here's a tip:

[itex]L = 2C+\pi\frac{(D+d)}{2}+\frac{(D-d)^{2}}{4C}[/itex]

use a lower case [itex]\pi[/itex] to indicate the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. The upper case [itex]\Pi[/itex] is generally used in mathematics to indicate the product of several different terms.
 
Ok, So I'm guessing
[itex]L = 2C+\frac{\pi(D+d)}{2}+\frac{(D-d)^{2}}{4C}[/itex]
Should become
[itex]LC = 2C^2+\frac{\pi C(D+d)}{2}+\frac{C(D-d)^{2}}{4C}[/itex]

Is that correct?

It still has me wondering why the C doesn't effect the denominator.
 
Last edited:
It does! That was the whole point of multiplying by it. The C in the denominator cancels the C in the numerator leaving
[tex]LC= 2C^2+ \frac{\pi C(D+ d)}{2}+ \frac{(D-d)^2}{4}[/tex]
That is the same as
[tex]2C^2+ \left(\frac{\pi(D+ d)}{2}-L\right)C+ \left[\frac{(D- d)^2}{4}\right]= 0[/tex]

That is a quadratic equation. I wouldn't worry about "factoring"- use the quadratic formula.
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
It does! That was the whole point of multiplying by it. The C in the denominator cancels the C in the numerator leaving
[tex]LC= 2C^2+ \frac{\pi C(D+ d)}{2}+ \frac{(D-d)^2}{4}[/tex]
That is the same as
[tex]2C^2+ \left(\frac{\pi(D+ d)}{2}-L\right)C+ \left[\frac{(D- d)^2}{4}\right]= 0[/tex]

That is a quadratic equation. I wouldn't worry about "factoring"- use the quadratic formula.
:P Right. I missed that you had canceled the C in the denominator.

Ahhhh! The quadratic Eq'n! Forgot about that old chestnut. Alright, let's give this a try.

[itex]C=\frac{-\left(\frac{\pi(D+d)}{2}-L\right)\pm \sqrt{\left(\frac{\pi(D+d)}{2}\right)^2-4(2)\left(\frac{(D-d)^2}{4}\right)}}{2(2)}[/itex]

That's very interesting... I need to try to jam all that into a CAD program now. I should probably attempt to check it first too...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K