Isomorphism: subspace to subspace?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mapping from the space of polynomials of degree two or less (P2) to the space of 2x2 real matrices (M2(R)). The participants are exploring whether this mapping can be an isomorphism, particularly focusing on the dimensions of the respective spaces and the nature of the transformation involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which a mapping can be an isomorphism, including the need for equal dimensions and surjectivity. There are inquiries about the dimensionality of the range and whether the mapping is onto when considering subspaces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the necessary checks for isomorphism and the implications of dimensionality in the context of the transformation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions for isomorphism, but no consensus has been reached on the specific mapping's properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the distinction between the general mapping from P2 to M2(R) and the specific transformation being analyzed. There is uncertainty regarding the invertibility of the transformation matrix and its implications for establishing isomorphism.

BeRiemann
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We're looking at a mapping from P2 (polynomials of degree two or less) to M2(R) (the set of 2x2 real matrices). The nuance here is that the transformation into the matricies is such that its basis consists of only three independent matrices, making its dimension 3. This means that our transformation maps from P2 (dim = 3) to M2(r) (dim = 3 in this case)
Can a mapping to a subspace make the transformation an isomorphism?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this mapping might be an isomorphism on the sibspace. Do you know whether it is surjective?? This is already enough for showing it an isomorphism.

Indeed: if V and W both have equal dimension then a map T:V\rightarrow W is an isomorphism if and only if it is surjective and linear (or injective and linear). This is the alternative theorem.
 
The transformation itself is
P2 →M2(ℝ)
T(ax2 + bx + c) → Matrix(a11 = -b-a, a12 = 0, a21 = 3c-a, a22 = -2b)
 
Last edited:
Yes, so is the range three dimensional??
 
Yes, the range itself is a three dimensional subspace of the four dimension space of 2x2 real matrices. I'm just not sure if it's an isomorphism.
 
What is left to check for it to be an isomorphism??
 
Well we need to know Dim(V) = Dim(W), but what I'm curious about is if we take the dimension from the general mapping P2 to M2(R) or from the actual transformation.
We're not actually onto if we consider the general mapping, but we're onto if we consider the subspace mapping.

The other way to check would be finding the matrix of the transformation and seeing if it's invertible, but I've had no luck with that.
 
I'm still at a loss with this problem :/
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K