Isotopes:the difference between fractionation and selection processes

  • Thread starter Thread starter WaterEngineer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the distinction between "isotope fractionation" and "selection processes" in the context of isotope hydrology. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these concepts, particularly in relation to processes like evaporation and the transport of isotopes in various environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the definitions of "isotope fractionation" and "selection processes," questioning whether evaporation should be classified as one or the other.
  • Another participant suggests that fractionation occurs during chemical reactions and physical processes, noting that differences in mass lead to varying affinities for different states.
  • A participant introduces the concept of vertical transport of 13C in oceans as an example of a selection process, where biota are depleted in 13C due to preferential use of 12C in photosynthesis.
  • There is a discussion about whether selection could refer to kinetic fractionation instead of equilibrium fractionation, with some expressing uncertainty about this distinction.
  • One participant argues that while decay may lead to some fractionation, the transport of 13C-depleted remains by sinking should be considered a selection process rather than fractionation.
  • The Rayleigh effect is mentioned, with participants debating whether the removal of heavier isotopes during precipitation should be classified as fractionation or selection.
  • Participants express confusion over the definitions and applications of fractionation and selection, indicating that interpretations may vary among different sources or individuals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express confusion and uncertainty regarding the definitions of fractionation and selection processes, with no consensus reached on how to classify specific examples like evaporation or the Rayleigh effect.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions of fractionation and selection processes may depend on specific contexts and interpretations, leading to varying understandings of the terms.

WaterEngineer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Isotopes:the difference between "fractionation" and "selection processes"

I'm reading a book about Isotope Hydrology and it differentiates between "isotope fractionation" which denotes any situation where changes in isotopic abundances result, and "selection processes" which are situations such as when the average isotopic composition of a compartment changes due to the compartment not being well mixed and then partially utilised.

However, I am unclear of the difference between the two, what is fractionation exactly? Under which bracket does evaporation occur? eg. after precipitation, you could argue that some is "partially utilised" in evaporation, making it a selection process, or you could say that the mass effect reduces the vapour pressure of the heavier isotope, therefore making it a fractionation process. If anyone could clarify the definitions it would be great.

(The book is Isotope Hydrology, A study of the water cycle, Joel R. Gat.)
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org


Fractination, if you have a certain ratio of fat and skinny boys in class and you call them out for getting candy, what would that do the the fat /skinny ratio of the first arriving boys at the point of distribution?

Back later, just an intro :smile:
 


Sorry, I thought it was going to be easy to answer this but it seems not so.

Anyway isotope fractination happens during chemical reactions and/or physical processes (diffusion, evaporation, condensation, sublimation etc). The difference in masses (fat and skinny boys) make that there are different affinities for the different states

I could not find however a clear definition of selection processes. However what comes to mind for instance is the vertical transport of 13C in the oceans. Biota are usually depleted with 13C due to the higher affinity for 12C in the photosynthesis. Dead organisms sink to the ocean bottom and decay causing a selection of less 13C in the deep oceans. Hence limestone and foraminifera shells from the deep are depleted in 13C due to that selection process by gravity.

On the other hand 'selection' could also refer to kinetic fractination rather than equilibrium fractination

But I understand the confusion.
my two cents. it may still be something else.
 
Last edited:


Thanks for your input, glad I'm not the only one confused :)

I see what you mean about the biota, fractionation being the process by which the biota are depleted in 13C however, the selection process being that they decay at the bottom of the ocean.

I don't think that 'selection' could refer to kinetic fractination rather than equilibrium fractination, because the book I'm reading describes the two types of fractionation.

Thanks for your help though!
 


WaterEngineer said:
I see what you mean about the biota, fractionation being the process by which the biota are depleted in 13C however, the selection process being that they decay at the bottom of the ocean...

Actually the decay would lead to some fractination, but I was explicitely thinking of the transport of 13C depleted remains by sinking, that is no fractination but still a process that alters the general d13C of the local environt, not fractination but transport, could that be 'selection'?

One can also think of the Rayleigh effect or Rayleigh fractination maybe where the fractinated bit is removed from the environment after the process, altering the ratio of the remaining species, evidently as a cloud rains out, the heavy isotopes go out first, leaving the cloud lighter and lighter in isotopes, not by fractination but by ..selection?

More two cents.
 


Andre said:
Actually the decay would lead to some fractination, but I was explicitely thinking of the evidently as a cloud rains out, the heavy isotopes go out first, leaving the cloud lighter and lighter in isotopes, not by fractination but by ..selection?

Maybe, but as the formation of a cloud involved a phase change, I would have thought it would be considered as fractionation...

Difficult, it seems the more I read, the more people seem to have a different take on what fractionation is
 


WaterEngineer said:
Maybe, but as the formation of a cloud involved a phase change, I would have thought it would be considered as fractionation...

Yes obviously, but during the life time of the cloud, when the heavier isotopes rain out first, the remaining watervapor gets lighter and lighter (Rayleigh effect), without going through a phase change.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K