Isotropic rank 3 pseudotensor help

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotropic rank
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on how isotropic rank 3 pseudotensors can be expressed in the form a_{ijk} = λ ε_{ijk}, similar to isotropic rank 2 tensors. Participants clarify the definitions of pseudotensors, noting that they change sign under coordinate reflections. The consensus is that pseudotensors invariant under general rotations must be proportional to the Levi-Civita rank 3 pseudotensor. The conversation highlights two main challenges: demonstrating that λ ε_{ijk} remains unchanged under orthonormal transformations and proving that all invariant rank 3 pseudotensors take this form. The importance of accounting for coordinate reflections in the proof is also emphasized.
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
Can anybody show me how any isotropic rank 3 pseudotensor can be written as

a_{ijk}=\lambda \epsilon_{ijk}

for the isotropic rank 2 tensor case [i.e. a_{ij}=\lamda \delta_{ij} ], my notes prove it by considering an example i.e. a rotation by \frac{\pi}{2} radians about the z axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


anyone?
 


No help yet? It's not clear to me how you're using indices. Are you writing vectors with lower indices?

Secondly, are you defining pseudotensors as tensors that change sign under a reflection of the coordinates such as (x,y,z)-->(-x,y,z)? There are two definitions of a pseudotensor.

Edit: Actually, it should be obvious from your question that you are using the first definition.

So the claim is that the only pseudotensors, whos elements remain unchanged under a general rotation, are equal to the totally antisymmetric tensor multiplied by some scaling factor.
 
Last edited:


yes.
i guess then i meant that such a pseudotensor is proprotional to the levi civita rank 3 pseudotensor.

how does one actually show that though?
 


They're not giving you much to go on, are they?

The easy problem (1) is to show that the elements of \lambda \epsilon_{ijk} are unchanged under othonormal transformations. The hard part is (2) showing that the elements of all rank 3 pseudotensors that remain unchanged are of the form \lambda \epsilon_{ijk}.

The only difference between tensors and pseudovectors in this proof is that you have to eventually account for an optional reflection of coordinates.

I would tackle the first problem first:


Tensors transform as the product of vectors.

An orthornormal transformation in three dimensions can be obtained as the product of the transformations that rotate vectors about the X, Y and Z axis.
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K