Issue regarding oxygen storage with other elements

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the release of oxygen from cyanobacteria after the ice ages, as described in Nick Lane's book on oxygen. Participants debate the effectiveness of burying oxygen versus its reaction with organic matter, highlighting the formation of covalent bonds. A critical point raised is the misunderstanding of iron oxidation states, specifically the erroneous claim regarding Fe(I) and the oxidation process leading to rust formation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate redox state representation in the context of oxygen storage and reactivity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redox reactions and oxidation states
  • Familiarity with the chemistry of oxygen and its interactions with elements
  • Knowledge of cyanobacteria and their role in atmospheric oxygen production
  • Basic principles of covalent bonding and electron donation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of oxygen release from cyanobacteria
  • Study the redox chemistry of iron, specifically Fe(I) and its oxidation states
  • Explore the formation and properties of rust (FeO and Fe2O3)
  • Investigate the role of organic matter in oxygen storage and reactivity
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, environmental scientists, and students studying biogeochemical cycles, particularly those interested in the interactions between oxygen and various elements in the context of historical climate events.

olee
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
this is from Nick Lane's Oxygen book
I didn't quite understand this paragraph regarding the sudden release of a large amount of oxygen from cyanobacteria following the ice ages

2q20gzp.png


i don't understand how it's better to bury it. surely reacting with organic matter would be better as it is more likely to form a covalent bond with oxygen as it is willing to donate electrons
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Consider his actual words..." ...best way of preventing the complete re-uptake of atmospheric oxygen..."

You are saying the same thing.
 
When oxidized, a single atom of iron loses one electron to oxygen to form rust.

Well, that's wrong. Fe(I) is a rare and unstable redox state for iron. Rusting consists of two, or three-electron oxidation to form FeO or Fe2O3.

A carbon atom does undergo four-electron oxidation to form CO2, but that means it binds 33% more oxygen than iron, not four times as much.
(if we're going to be fair and choose the highest oxidation state of iron, since he chose the highest oxidation state of carbon).

That's a pretty embarrassing mistake coming from a guy who's got a PhD.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
81
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K