Iteration method for density equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Method
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the iteration method for density equations in the interaction picture, specifically focusing on the derivation and implications of equations related to the time evolution of the density operator, ρ(t). The scope includes theoretical aspects of quantum mechanics and perturbation theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 introduces the equations governing the time evolution of the density operator and seeks clarification on the derivation of equation (3) from equation (2).
  • Post 2 asserts that equation (3) can be derived from equation (2) through substitution and emphasizes that both equations are exact formulas used in perturbation calculations.
  • Post 2 also suggests that the first and second order approximations improve accuracy, contingent on the convergence of the sequence.
  • Post 3 questions the necessity of iterating an exact solution, expressing confusion over the rationale behind seeking perturbative corrections when equation (2) is already exact.
  • Post 4 clarifies that while equation (2) is exact, it does not provide a straightforward solution for ρ(t) without prior knowledge of its value, and positions equation (2) as an integral form of the differential equation (1).
  • Post 4 further explains that equation (2) can serve as a starting point for approximate solutions, with equation (3) representing a second order correction, but acknowledges the complexity in transitioning from formal equations to practical solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the utility of iterating an exact formula, with some arguing for the necessity of perturbative approaches while others question the rationale behind such iterations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity and practicality of deriving solutions from the presented equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the transition from formal equations to practical solutions may involve complexities that are not fully addressed in the discussion.

Robert_G
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
hi there; I need some help with the following formulas

In the interaction picture.

##\frac{d}{dt}\rho(t)=\frac{1}{i\hbar}[V(t),\rho(t)]## (1)

Then

##\rho(t+\Delta t) = \rho(t)+\frac{1}{i\hbar}\int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' [V(t'),\rho(t')]## (2)

This equation can be iterated. and it is

##\Delta \rho(t)=\frac{1}{i\hbar}\int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' [V(t'),\rho(t')]+(\frac{1}{i\hbar})^2 \int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' \int_t^{t'}dt''[\underbrace{V(t'),[V(t'')}_{Note\;t'\;and\;t''},\rho(t'')]]## (3)

##\Delta \rho(t) = \rho(t+\Delta t) - \rho(t)##

I can understand the eq.(2), but not the eq. (3).
Is anybody know how to get the equation (3). and why do we want to do such calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Formula (2) is an exact formula.
By substituting formula (2) into formula (2), you get formula (3).
Formula (3) is therefore also an exact formula.

These formulas are typically used for perturbation calculations.
These are approximations where ρ is constant without the interaction V: ρ(t) ~ρ(0) for V=0.
Replacing ρ(t') = ρ(0) in formula (2) is then a first order approximation.
Replacing ρ(t") = ρ(0) in formula (3) is then a second order approximation.
The second order approximation should be better than the first order ... if this sequence is converging!
 
If formula (2) is already the exact solution. It should contain all the information, why we still iterate it to get the perturbation. It does not make sense to me.
 
It's an exact formula, but not really a solution.
To calculate ρ(t) from equation (2), you need to know ρ(t). (!)
Equation (2) replaces the differential equation (1), by an integral equation (2).
The equation (2) is not easier to solve for ρ(t) than equation (1).

However, equation (2) can be the starting point for an approximate solution.
If ρ(t)=ρ(0) is a good zero order approximation, then equation (2) gives you the first order correction.
Similarly, equation (3) is a second order correction.

Of course, going from these formal equations to a practical solution might not be a piece of cake.
These formal solutions are only a starting point for more developments.

Try these ideas on some exercices.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K