Iteration method for density equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Method
Robert_G
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
hi there; I need some help with the following formulas

In the interaction picture.

##\frac{d}{dt}\rho(t)=\frac{1}{i\hbar}[V(t),\rho(t)]## (1)

Then

##\rho(t+\Delta t) = \rho(t)+\frac{1}{i\hbar}\int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' [V(t'),\rho(t')]## (2)

This equation can be iterated. and it is

##\Delta \rho(t)=\frac{1}{i\hbar}\int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' [V(t'),\rho(t')]+(\frac{1}{i\hbar})^2 \int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' \int_t^{t'}dt''[\underbrace{V(t'),[V(t'')}_{Note\;t'\;and\;t''},\rho(t'')]]## (3)

##\Delta \rho(t) = \rho(t+\Delta t) - \rho(t)##

I can understand the eq.(2), but not the eq. (3).
Is anybody know how to get the equation (3). and why do we want to do such calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Formula (2) is an exact formula.
By substituting formula (2) into formula (2), you get formula (3).
Formula (3) is therefore also an exact formula.

These formulas are typically used for perturbation calculations.
These are approximations where ρ is constant without the interaction V: ρ(t) ~ρ(0) for V=0.
Replacing ρ(t') = ρ(0) in formula (2) is then a first order approximation.
Replacing ρ(t") = ρ(0) in formula (3) is then a second order approximation.
The second order approximation should be better than the first order ... if this sequence is converging!
 
If formula (2) is already the exact solution. It should contain all the information, why we still iterate it to get the perturbation. It does not make sense to me.
 
It's an exact formula, but not really a solution.
To calculate ρ(t) from equation (2), you need to know ρ(t). (!)
Equation (2) replaces the differential equation (1), by an integral equation (2).
The equation (2) is not easier to solve for ρ(t) than equation (1).

However, equation (2) can be the starting point for an approximate solution.
If ρ(t)=ρ(0) is a good zero order approximation, then equation (2) gives you the first order correction.
Similarly, equation (3) is a second order correction.

Of course, going from these formal equations to a practical solution might not be a piece of cake.
These formal solutions are only a starting point for more developments.

Try these ideas on some exercices.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top