IVP Laplace Transform Problem - Tricky Inverse Laplace Transform

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving a second-order linear ordinary differential equation using the Laplace transform method, specifically focusing on the inverse Laplace transform of a derived function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Laplace transforms and the challenges of finding the inverse transform for a specific term. Questions arise about the feasibility of completing the square for the denominator and the implications of non-real roots.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods for handling the inverse Laplace transform. Some guidance has been offered regarding partial fraction expansion and completing the square, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's initial conditions and the structure of the differential equation are central to the discussion, with participants navigating the complexities of the inverse transform process.

jimagnus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
IVP Laplace Transform Problem -- Tricky Inverse Laplace Transform

Homework Statement



Solve x"+x'+x=1, given x(0)=x'(0)=0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Plugged in transforms: s2*Y(s)-s*y(0)-y'(0)+s*Y(s)-y(0)+Y(s)=1/s
Plugged in initial value points, simplified to Y(s)=1/((s2+s+1)*s)
Partial Fractions led me to Y(s)=1/s+ (-s-1)/(s^2+s+1)

I get stuck at finding an inverse transform for the second term. You can't complete the square for the denominator, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can still do a partial fraction expansion even if the roots of the denominator aren't real.
 
Last edited:


jimagnus said:
I get stuck at finding an inverse transform for the second term. You can't complete the square for the denominator, right?
Why not?
 


If I complete the square, I get the denominator is (s+1/2)2+3/4, and the numerator is -(s+1), and I don't know what inverse laplace transform this would be.
 


Hint: s+1 = (s+1/2) + 1/2
 


oh right, I didn't think to break it up like that.

so you end up with 1/s-[(s+1/2)/((s+1/2)2+3/4)+1/2 / ((s+1/2)2+3/4), which becomes 1-e-t/2cos3t/4-√3/3 * e-t/2sin√3/2

thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K