Jackson Sec 2.6 on "general solution" of charge near sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Section 2.6 of Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" addresses the interaction between a point charge and a sphere, but it does not pertain to a conducting sphere. The solution presented involves a potential that varies with azimuth and polar angle, indicating that the sphere is not conducting. Instead, it is concluded that the sphere is a non-interacting sphere in proximity to the point charge, which raises questions about its practical relevance. The Dirichlet Green's function is referenced, emphasizing its application to the electrostatic potential in the presence of a grounded surface.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and potential theory
  • Familiarity with Green's functions in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of the method of image charges
  • Basic concepts of dielectric materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Green's functions in electrostatics
  • Explore the method of image charges for solving electrostatic problems
  • Research the properties of dielectric materials and their interactions with point charges
  • Review Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" for deeper insights into potential theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, electrostatics, and mathematical methods in physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking clarity on the implications of Jackson's treatment of charge interactions with different types of spheres.

ForgetfulPhysicist
Messages
31
Reaction score
2
Hi , I'd like a little bit of clarification about Section 2.6 from Jackson's classic book on E & M.

Section 2.6 starts out with the problem of a "conducting sphere" near a point charge, but then it confusingly veers away to a problem where potential is prescribed to vary with azimuth and polar angle. So my question is: can somebody verify that the solution at the end of Section 2.6 is NOT for a conducting sphere? After all, a conducting sphere would NOT have potential varying in the azimuth etc...

Further, if it's NOT a conducting sphere then what is the interaction between the "nearby point charge" and the sphere? Is it a dielectric sphere? Is it a completely non-interacting sphere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sphere in 2.6 is not a conducting sphere, but the Dirichlet Green's function is the potential given by a point charge outside a conducting sphere.
 
Please continue on to answer my follow on questions: "if it's NOT a conducting sphere then what is the interaction between the "nearby point charge" and the sphere? Is it a dielectric sphere? Is it a completely non-interacting sphere?"
 
It seems the answer is "it's a completely non-interacting sphere near a point charge"... which seems to be a very useless, rarely occurring, seldom-real-world-application, mathterbation example for Jackson to spend our time on.
 
For the Dirchlet condition, i.e., ##G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=0## for ##\vec{x}' \in S## (where ##S## is the surface under consideration, i.e., in this case the sphere), the Green's function is formally the electrostatic potential ##\phi(\vec{x}')## for a unit charge located in ##\vec{x}## at presence of a conducting "grounded" surface ##S##. For a sphere it can be determined using the method of image charges.
 
"Is it a dielectric sphere? Is it a completely non-interacting sphere?"
It doesn't matter what kind of sphere it is. Read Jackson's section on Green's functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K