MHB JPARK 's question at Yahoo Answers (Cardinality)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cardinality
AI Thread Summary
To demonstrate that if |A| ≤ |B| and |B| ≤ |C|, then |A| ≤ |C|, one can use the concept of injective functions. If there exists an injective function f from set A to set B and an injective function g from set B to set C, then the composition of these functions, g ∘ f, creates an injective function from A to C. This shows that |A| is less than or equal to |C|, confirming the transitive property of cardinality. The response effectively clarifies the relationship between the sets and the implications of injective mappings. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping cardinality in set theory.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

My professor wasn't clear in lecture today, so I'm not exactly sure how I should show this...Can anyone help?

Let A,B,C be sets. Show that if |A| ≤ |B| and |B| ≤ |C|, then |A| ≤ |C|

Here is a link to the question:

Cardinality of Sets Homework Problem? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello JPARK, $$|A|\leq |B|\Leftrightarrow \exists f:A\to B\mbox{ injective}\\
|B|\leq |C|\Leftrightarrow \exists g:B\to C\mbox{ injective}$$ But $g\circ f:A\to C$ is injective (the composition of injective maps is injective), hence $|A|\leq |C|$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top