Jumping vertically on a moving train....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marvinski87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Train
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of jumping inside a moving vehicle, specifically a train or bus. According to Newton's first law and the Principle of Relativity, when a person jumps vertically while inside a moving vehicle, they land in the same spot because both the person and the vehicle are moving at the same speed. If the person were to jump from the roof of the vehicle, they would not land in the same spot due to wind resistance affecting their trajectory. This illustrates the concept of relative motion in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's first law of motion
  • Familiarity with the Principle of Relativity
  • Basic knowledge of relative motion
  • Awareness of wind resistance effects on moving objects
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's laws of motion in detail
  • Explore the Principle of Relativity and its applications
  • Investigate the effects of wind resistance on moving objects
  • Learn about inertial and non-inertial reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining motion concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of relative motion and forces in a moving environment.

Marvinski87
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm clueless when it comes to physics, so forgive me if this sounds stupid. But fot years I've wondered something, and no one seems to have an answer for it.

If you are standing inside a moving bus or train, and you jump on the spot (straight up,not in the direction that the vehicle is moving) then how come you land on the same bit of flooring that you started on? The vehicle is moving, so shouldn't it have left you behind slightly,thus you land further down the vehicle?? If that makes sense? Someone enlighten me please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

This is Newton's first law:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion
First law: When viewed in an inertial reference frame, an object either remains at rest or continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted upon by a force.[2][3

Or more broadly, the Principle of Relativity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galilean_invariance
Galileo Galilei first described this principle in 1632 in hisDialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems using the example of a ship traveling at constant velocity, without rocking, on a smooth sea; any observer doing experiments below the deck would not be able to tell whether the ship was moving or stationary.
 
Marvinski87 said:
The vehicle is moving, so shouldn't it have left you behind slightly,thus you land further down the vehicle??

no ... think about it a moment before I give an answer

what is the immediate relationship between you, everything else in the vehicle and the vehicle ?

your same Q could be asked for when you jump up off the ground (up off the earth)
after all it's rotation speed is much faster ... equatorial speed of 465.1 m/s, 1,674.4 km/h or 1,040.4 mphDave
 
Thanks for taking the time to reply guys. But let me stress something. I'm thick as s**t. So russ watters I'm afraid that went over my head a bit... could you explain a bit simpler please mate. Much appreciated
 
Marvinski87 said:
The vehicle is moving
Movement is relative. The vehicle is not moving relative to you.
 
You, everything in it and the train, bus etc are moving at the same speed

That's what I wanted you to figure out

So when you jump up, you are still moving at that speed, there is nothing to slow you down,
so you end up landing in the same place you jumped from
 
davenn said:
You, everything in it and the train, bus etc are moving at the same speed

That's what I wanted you to figure out

So when you jump up, you are still moving at that speed, there is nothing to slow you down,
so you end up landing in the same place you jumped from

Right ok I think I get it...So say if you were on the roof of the train as opposed to inside,and you jumped..you wouldn't land on the same spot then would you?
 
Marvinski87 said:
Right ok I think I get it...So say if you were on the roof of the train as opposed to inside, and you jumped..you wouldn't land on the same spot then would you?

that's true, because (say on a calm, no wind day) there would still be significant wind resistance against you and would cause you to land behind the point you jumped from

adding a wind from any direction will vary the results

Dave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
70K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K