K-beta line for the X-ray spectra of Molybdenum with Moseley

  • I
  • Thread starter super_adun
  • Start date
  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

This should be easy but I'm totally stuck here.

So I'm calculating the Kβ line (emitted energy) of Molybdenum (Mo 42). I'm using Moseley's law and am moving from the M-shell to the K-shell. Recall Moseley's law is E = 13.6 eV (Z-σ)2 *1/n2. The effective formula for the energy emitted is thus E = 13.6 eV (Z-σ)2 *(1- (⅓2) since I am moving from n = 3 to n = 1. σ is the screening constant of n =3 of Molybdenum. Using a screening constant of 1 (I know this is incorrect, but bare with me) I get that the difference in energy is 20.321 keV. The answer according to all tables I've seen is 19.607 keV.

The only thing I could think was that the error was due to the approximation of the screening constant. Solving the equation backwards for the "table value"of K-beta gives an Zeff of 40.27. I can't fit the screening constant into that equation, since it is 4.15, as calculated with Slater's rules.

Could anybody tell me what I am missing here? I'm super thankful for all the help I can get.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
963
213
The only thing I could think was that the error was due to the approximation of the screening constant. Solving the equation backwards for the "table value"of K-beta gives an Zeff of 40.27. I can't fit the screening constant into that equation, since it is 4.15, as calculated with Slater's rules.

Could anybody tell me what I am missing here? I'm super thankful for all the help I can get.
you may try a screening constant sigma(31) =1,72 for the Kbeta transition and check if you get a correct value
Mo z=42 E (Kalpha)17.48 sigma(21) 0.60
E (K beta)19.61 sigma(31) 1.72

details you can see at :
http://www.ld-didactic.de/literatur/hb/e/p6/p6354_e.pdf
 
  • #3
you may try a screening constant sigma(31) =1,72 for the Kbeta transition and check if you get a correct value
Mo z=42 E (Kalpha)17.48 sigma(21) 0.60
E (K beta)19.61 sigma(31) 1.72

details you can see at :
http://www.ld-didactic.de/literatur/hb/e/p6/p6354_e.pdf

Thank you, this would make it exactly right. I'm still not entirely sure how the screening constant (σ) is calculated if the energy E is unknown. How would you do it?
I tried with Slater's rules but I couldn't get it right. Thanks a lot for the help!
 
  • #4
963
213
I'm still not entirely sure how the screening constant (σ) is calculated if the energy E is unknown. How would you do it?
i have a hunch that a theoretical estimate of screening of the nuclear charge can be made exactly if you know the 'exact' electronic charge distribution- and electronic shell charge distribution is not 'realistic' enough to give correct picture except perhaps s-shells which are spherically symmetric -therefore the experimental estimates of sigma can be used and an average effect of screening is used instead
 

Related Threads on K-beta line for the X-ray spectra of Molybdenum with Moseley

Replies
0
Views
139
Replies
2
Views
809
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
26K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
546
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
953
Replies
4
Views
5K
Top