K cannot be what, if you want this matrix to form a basis, confused

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The matrix given by the rows 4 -4 4, -5 6 -3, and 0 4 k can form a basis for R^3 if and only if k is not equal to 0. The row reduction process confirms that the first two columns are linearly independent, resulting in a row echelon form of 1 0 0, 0 1 0, 0 0 0. To determine the value of k without manual row reduction, one must ensure that the last column can yield a non-zero vector when solving Mx=0, specifically aiming for a solution that does not lead to a trivial case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence in matrices
  • Familiarity with row reduction techniques
  • Knowledge of basis concepts in vector spaces
  • Ability to solve linear equations involving parameters
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the criteria for linear independence in matrices
  • Learn about row echelon form and its applications in linear algebra
  • Explore the implications of parameters in matrix equations
  • Investigate the concept of spanning sets in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, and vector spaces, will benefit from this discussion.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
4 -4 4
-5 6 -3
0 4 k
form a basis for R^3 if and only if k != ?
since the last col has a k in it, i wanted to see if the first 2 colmuns are linear indepdant, adn they are, because i row reduced w/calculator:
4 -4 0
-5 6 0
0 4 0
and got
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
is there a quick way to figure out the k, without mantually row reducing with k? Also if there isn't a quick way, what am i going to be looking for? it will span R^3 if i get
0
0
1
for the last col with k in it. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't *have* to get down to 1's, merely linearly independent rows/cols, 1s are just nice. And it's better if you say "when do the rows/cols form a basis", rather than "when is the matrix a basis of R^3": the matirx is never a basis of R^3; it isn't even an element of R^3.

Remember, you're just looking for a solution of Mx=0 to imply x=0, so that's an easy criterion to check when there is only 1 variable (k) to check
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K