1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

K topology strictly finer than standard topology

  1. Sep 20, 2006 #1
    I would like a little clarification in how to prove that the k topology on R is strictly finer than the standard topology on R. They have a proof of this in Munkres' book. I know how to prove that its finer, but the part that shows it to be strictly finer im not sure. It says given the basis element B = (-1,1) - K for T'' (the k topology), there is no open interval that contains 0 and lies in B. If what it says is what i think then i can think of many counterexamples, for example: use the element 1/2 of K. (-1,1)-K = (-3/2,1/2). Use the open interval (-1/3, 1/3) which lies in B right?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 20, 2006 #2

    AKG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    No, all the elements 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ... are outside of B. Any open interval around 0 has to have one of these fractions. Think about it. An open interval around 0 must be of the form (a, b) with a < 0 < b. If b > 1, then choose n = 2. Clearly, 1/2 is in (a, b) but it's not in B. If b < 1, take n = floor(1/b). Then 1/n is in (a,b) but not in B.
     
  4. Sep 22, 2006 #3
    ok i think i know what my problem was. I took (-1,1) - K to mean the set of all x-1/n between -1 and 1, where n is a positive integer and x is real. I guess the minus K actually means exclude any 1/n for any positive integer n from the interval (-1,1). Yes, in that case, any open interval in there would have to contain some 1/n 's, and therefore is not in B.
     
  5. Sep 22, 2006 #4

    AKG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yes, (-1,1) is a set, and K is a set, and (-1,1) - K is their set difference.
     
  6. Sep 6, 2009 #5
    sorry for bumping this old topic. i'm reading this section right now and i'm very confused.

    can some one give me a notation for definition of k-topology? may be an example? the book said basis is the interval (a,b), along with sets (a,b) - K where K is stated above. What the difference between interval and set? isn't open interval of real numbers is uncountable set?
    so is it (a,b) U [(a,b) - K] ? or just (a,b) - K? or maybe if 0 not in (a,b) then it's just the interval (a,b), and if 0 in (a,b) then it is (a,b) - K?

    thanks.
     
  7. Nov 23, 2009 #6
    Thanks for clearing this up.

    I was also thinking that (-1,1) - K meant the set of all x-1/n between -1 and 1 (basically, the open interval (-2,1) in R).

    Hopefully this will help becu:

    We're looking at a basis element in the K-topology,
    B = {x in R: -1 < x < 1}\{1/n: n is a natural number}.
    So, if we look at any open interval in R (in the standard topology) containing 0, we cannot find that interval in the R_K topology, since this excludes all numbers of the form 1/n: n is in N, but every open interval containing 0 in R contains a number of the form 1/n (archimedean principle). Thus the interval in R (std.) contains elements which are not in R_K, so by definition the interval cannot be a subset of B.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: K topology strictly finer than standard topology
Loading...