senmeis said:Statement from your link:
Spot beams are ‘hotter’ than conventional wide beams which must spread their energy across a wider area, and therefore have a greater ability to cut through weather. HTS systems are also designed to dynamically adjust their characteristics, such as individual beam power, to account for atmospheric conditions in a particular sub-region.
That is what I mean, but the word „ONLY“ may be exaggerated.Senmeis
In addition to this, new High Throughput Satellite (HTS) systems also better enable Ka- and Ku- alike to overcome weather issues, as compared to traditional wide beam systems.
Ka and Ku are two different frequency bands used for satellite communication. Ka band has a higher frequency range of 26.5-40 GHz, while Ku band has a lower frequency range of 12-18 GHz. This means that Ka band can transmit more data at a faster rate, but it is more prone to interference from weather and other obstacles.
It depends on the specific needs and requirements of the communication system. Ka band is better for high-speed data transmission, while Ku band is better for long-distance communication and has a stronger signal penetration. Therefore, Ka band is more commonly used for broadband internet and multimedia services, while Ku band is used for TV broadcasting and long-distance communication.
No, Ka and Ku communication satellites are not interchangeable. They operate on different frequency bands and require different equipment and technology for communication. Therefore, a Ka band satellite cannot be used for Ku band communication and vice versa.
Ka band communication satellites offer higher data transmission rates, which is beneficial for services like broadband internet and multimedia. They also have a smaller antenna size, making them more cost-effective and easier to deploy. Additionally, Ka band has a larger frequency spectrum, allowing for more satellites to be in orbit and reducing the risk of signal interference.
One concern with Ka band communication is its susceptibility to interference from weather and other obstacles. This can affect the quality and reliability of the communication, especially in areas with frequent severe weather. Additionally, the smaller antenna size can be a disadvantage in certain situations, such as long-distance communication and remote areas with limited infrastructure.