G037H3
- 280
- 2
cronxeh said:Movie Idiocracy comes to mind. The US is going down that route right now, with likes of Christine O'Donnel and Sarah Palin.
And Obama, Biden, Maxine Waters, etc.
cronxeh said:Movie Idiocracy comes to mind. The US is going down that route right now, with likes of Christine O'Donnel and Sarah Palin.
G037H3 said:Some things can be made into satire, but some things should be taken seriously, or at least relatively seriously. Those of you who consider yourselves Americans should be very concerned with the very real decline of the nation you support.
Ivan Seeking said:The thing about Stewart and Colbert is that they come as a two-edge sword. It is comedy heavily laced with hard commentary. This is why, imo, they are now emerging as a political force. I don't know how far they can take this, but with Huffington and Oprah involved, I tend to think this is intended as something more than comedy.
It's meant to counter the comedic rallies of the Tea PartyG037H3 said:Viewers of their programs aren't exactly cultured, so any political momentum they garner can be accurately labeled as untermenschen politics, which is the majority of politics, but is certainly not something to celebrate or support.
G037H3 said:Viewers of their programs aren't exactly cultured,
so any political momentum they garner can be accurately labeled as untermenschen politics, which is the majority of politics, but is certainly not something to celebrate or support.
You can't find either show funny unless you have enough appreciation for the political landscape to understand the satire being presented. If you accept the content of either show absent such background, you miss the point entirely. To call people who appreciate their shows "uncultured" is way off the mark. Their fans are probably the most well-informed and thoughtful TV viewers out there. It ain't Days of Our Lives.G037H3 said:Viewers of their programs aren't exactly cultured, so any political momentum they garner can be accurately labeled as untermenschen politics, which is the majority of politics, but is certainly not something to celebrate or support.
Wild speculation on your part?
How do you know? There is a difference between so-called untermenschen politics, and the witty observation of glaring but avoided facts. Beyond that, if you actually listen to what Stewart is saying, he is pleading for unity. He is actually reaching out to the tea partiers. So it sounds to me like you are simply tossing around assumptions.
You can't find either show funny unless you have enough appreciation for the political landscape to understand the satire being presented. If you accept the content of either show absent such background, you miss the point entirely. To call people who appreciate their shows "uncultured" is way off the mark. Their fans are probably the most well-informed and thoughtful TV viewers out there. It ain't Days of Our Lives.
Nihilism is not a viable option. Rejecting the flawed in the pursuit of the ideal is a sure path to self-destruction, personally or collectively.G037H3 said:"Well-informed and thoughtful", in my definition, extends far beyond the present that you live in. Real wisdom and intelligence is timeless. The supporters of such ideas that are espoused by said programs have no sense of the history of their own nation, their own cultural and historic identity, or any real understanding of how things work.
Which is how democracy works. It doesn't.
turbo-1 said:Nihilism is not a viable option. Rejecting the flawed in the pursuit of the ideal is a sure path to self-destruction, personally or collectively.
G037H3 said:Some things can be made into satire, but some things should be taken seriously, or at least relatively seriously. Those of you who consider yourselves Americans should be very concerned with the very real decline of the nation you support.
nismaratwork said:You speak as though satire can't be an effective political tool... history disagrees with you. Beyond that, it's clear that you're a serious ideologue of some kind, "worship money and weakness..." and more... so I'm not sure what the point of your posts are.
In short, just because you can't appreciate how satire uses humor to reach people in the same way you're reached by fear of American decline, doesn't mean it's ineffective. Much as you have no interest in reading about laws, it doesn't mean they don't apply to you, so to with satire.
G037H3 said:TV is not for the intelligent.
http://talkshownews.interbridge.com/2009/06/late-night-demographics-average-age-of.html"[T]he number of people older than 55 watching 'The Daily Show' rose by 25% [in May 2009, compared with May 2008], 22% for 'The Colbert Report.'" More ominously, "the number of people between the ages of 18 and 34 (the most coveted demographic) watching 'The Daily Show' fell 14%, 15% for 'The Colbert Report.'
The median age of "Daily Show" viewers in May 2009 was 41.4, and the median age of "Colbert Report" viewers was 38.3.
So I should sell all my stocks, quit my job, sell my house, and move. hmm...G037H3 said:I'm not a nihilist. I'm simply not very optimistic about the future of the US.
Pursuit of the ideal is how greater things must be accomplished. Worship of money and weakness is a sure path to failure.
And in related news...G037H3 said:Viewers of their programs aren't exactly cultured...
G037H3 said:Viewing actions as political tools is the problem to begin with, it's slave-morality behavour. I cannot refute you, so I shall mock you, ad nausem.
My ideology is history, which can tell you so much more than any living man.
Also, restate your second to last sentence please, it is unclear to me.
It says exactly what the pollsters measured in that part of their study. What's little for you, is presumably a lot for others.G037H3 said:@goku
That chart says rather little...
I can't understand what you mean by this (since my post has nothing to do with my own knowledge or positions), so I'm skipping it.and statistics is not a good way to impress upon me your knowledge or positions.
There's more in those links than just a study of the viewers' knowledge of politics. Perhaps you should read them first.Knowledge of politics has very little to do with being cultured.
I didn't imply that politics was culture. There is also mention of the education levels of different audiences. I suspect education may correlate more strongly with what you call 'culture'. And if you go back and read real carefully, you'll notice that I described my post as "related news", which should indicate that these are related observations rather than a direct response to the quoted point.Politics is not culture, it is the dirty manipulations that go on mostly behind the scenes, or right in plain sight for all to witness, wordlessly.
G037H3 said:
- If you only know one language (or haven't reached a high level of mastery in your native language) and are not at least studying another, you are uncultured.
- If you have never studied any great literature on your own, you are uncultured.
- If you don't know about the history of your people, you are uncultured.
- If you can't distinguish great art from recent art, you are uncultured.
- If you are a post-modernist or moral relativist, you are uncultured.
G037H3 said:
- If you only know one language (or haven't reached a high level of mastery in your native language) and are not at least studying another, you are uncultured.
OmCheeto said:Yay! Another compliment.
I've lost count of the languages I speak. Let me try and remember them all:
English, German, Russian, Serbian, Armenian, French, Spanish, Dutch, Hindi, Telugu, Geordie, Farsi, Arabic, Finnish, Romanian, Hungarian, Greek, Hebrew, Mandarin, Cantonese, Japanese, Korean, Ibo(but not very well), and Polish.
Ya znaio schto, you nyiechevo nie znaio.
My Armenian friend says that the fact that I can quote So-Crates* in Russian, is a very good thing.
I'm feeling so cultured today.
-------------------------
*Thank you Bill & Ted. If it weren't for you, I'd never have known what Napoleon looked like.
G037H3 said:
- If you only know one language (or haven't reached a high level of mastery in your native language) and are not at least studying another, you are uncultured.
- If you have never studied any great literature on your own, you are uncultured.
- If you don't know about the history of your people, you are uncultured.
- If you can't distinguish great art from recent art, you are uncultured.
- If you are a post-modernist or moral relativist, you are uncultured.
nismaratwork said:and this thread is getting far off topic.
nismaratwork said:A magyar egyedülálló nyelv, egy egyedi kultúra. E barbár (G037H3) nem értette kultúra ha külső ő fartő... Nerozumí smyslu kultury... Dydy 'n anhyblyg a blentyn.
G037H3: I know plenty of people who are multilingual, but would be generally considered uncultured. Megérteni? Shvatiti? Verstehen Sie? Zrozumieć?Lattom gőgös ember...
edit/P.S. OmCheeto: Do you ever run into the problem where you start to blend languages? For the longest time I kept using the Latin word for "cook/chef" whenever I spoke Spanish, or I'll slip into Japanese when I'm trying to speak anything... especially the word, "but". I have no idea why!
OmCheeto said:Why of course. I remember the first few weeks of Russian class at university, half of the class was already fluent in German, so we were always mixing up our "da's" with our "ya's". It was much fun.And for the life of me, I can no longer keep Serbian words out of my Russian conversations, and vice versa.
But I agree with you that multilingualism has little to do with being cultured. Most of the time it is a result of necessity or environment. I mean really, of what use is learning a foreign language if you don't need to? It's like learning COBOL and never writing a program.
Kapeesh?
nismaratwork said:If you don't agree with G037H3's remarkably narrow views... you're uncultured. I'm serious... are you actually an incredibly sophisticated fancier of satire, and this is all part of your method, or are you really thinking that anyone buys this line of... reasoning?
G037H3 said:You may be egalitarian if you really insist upon it. I, myself, am an aristocrat.
G037H3 said:You may be egalitarian if you really insist upon it. I, myself, am an aristocrat.
Tsu said:![]()
![]()
![]()