Boeing Keep your seatbelt low and tight in flight, especially when seated next to a plugged door

  • Thread starter Thread starter berkeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Flight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a recent incident involving an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX-9 that lost a door plug mid-flight, fortunately with no passengers injured. Concerns are raised about the structural integrity of the aircraft, particularly regarding the bolts that secure the door plug, with suggestions that multiple bolts may have failed or been improperly installed. Participants express skepticism about Boeing's quality control practices and the potential for counterfeit parts contributing to the failure. The grounding of affected aircraft for inspections has caused significant disruptions, leading to discussions about the safety of air travel and the implications for passenger confidence. Overall, the situation highlights serious concerns about aircraft safety and manufacturing standards.
  • #201
russ_watters said:
MCAS was mainly a programming problem. Better training might have been able to overcome it, but the root cause was the program reacting badly to bad information (a failed sensor).
MCAS was SW that was created to avoid the additional training that would have been required for pilots to get a new type rating. Then it was so poorly documented that pilots weren't trained to deal with failures (or even know it existed for some). A badly implemented solution to avoid training.

Run-away trim is a failure mode in other aircraft too, and pilots should be trained to recognize and deal with it regardless.

Also a bit of poor system design to rely on a single AOA sensor and then have SW that couldn't recognize non-sensical data.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #202
DaveE said:
Also a bit of poor system design to rely on a single AOA sensor and then have SW that couldn't recognize non-sensical data.
This is my biggest concern about the whole MCAS system… single point failures on a flight control system shouldn’t be acceptable on commercial aircraft. Almost everything else is dual-redundant or better.

The existence of the MCAS is a whole ‘nuther 55-gallon drum of worms from that, and is indicative of a serious cultural and systemic crisis within Boeing.
 
  • #203
... MCAS ...
Maybe Boeing should have called Southwest Airline's bluff, and done the right thing. Oops, there I go thinking like an engineer not a beancounter. Mea culpa.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters, Tom.G and Flyboy
  • #206
russ_watters said:
Maybe it should have. It seems like the changes Boeing needs are radical. Like, fire the top four levels of management and appoint the most senior engineer as CEO radical.
Having an engineer as a CEO is no panacea. The CEOs when Boeing moved the HQ to Chicago, merged with McDonald Douglas and made a lot of questionable decisions was Philip Condit (Master and PHD in Aeronautical Engineering) and Harry Stonecipher (BA in Physics). The CEO during the 737 Max fiasco was Dennis Muilenburg (master in Aeronautics and Astronautics) although work on the 737 Max was started under his predecessor. Stonecipher started out as a lab technician at GE and the other two worked in engineering at Boeing before going into management.

One of the best CEOs Boeing ever had was William McPherson Allen who ran the company from 1945-68. He was a Harvard lawyer and the only experience he had at Boeing before becoming CEO was as the corporate council on the board. Although he did decline the job at first since he though he was unqualified.
 
  • #207
glappkaeft said:
McDonald Douglas
McDonnell. McDonalds makes Happy Meals. (Then again, maybe we've discovered the problem)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Borg, Flyboy and berkeman
  • #208
Greg Bernhardt said:
Thoughts?
I think it’s a bandaid solution, and a cosmetic one at that.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #209
The problem with a "reformer" CEO is that the people underneath him who need reforming will want to see him fail, and will do what they can to make that happen. It's the rare one who actually can successfully clean house.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and Flyboy
  • #210
Agree. That can happen even when the new CEO replaces a bunch of direct reports, because *their* direct reports (and so on) are still there. The upper middle management can be devastatingly harmful. And resistant to change.
 
  • #211
LBJ once complained that some mid-level bureaucrat was undermining his policies. "Why don't you fire him?" he was asked. Johnson replied, "Fire him? I can't even find him!"
 
  • #212
Yep. It’s going to take one of the most thorough house cleanings in corporate history to truly fix Boeing’s woes. The comparison I would be inclined to use would be “chemotherapy”. 😒
 
  • #213
Vanadium 50 said:
LBJ once complained that some mid-level bureaucrat was undermining his policies. "Why don't you fire him?" he was asked. Johnson replied, "Fire him? I can't even find him!"
Love LBJ stories.

LBJ was getting ready to leave and there were 2 or 3 helicopters spooling up. He was walking towards one when the young Marine stopped him, saying, "you're helicopter is this one over here, sir." LBJ said, "son, they're *all* my helicopters."
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and Vanadium 50
  • #214
Who doesn't like an LBJ story? :smile:

It will be interesting to see what, if anything, changes.
 
  • #215
Vanadium 50 said:
The problem with a "reformer" CEO is that the people underneath him who need reforming will want to see him fail, and will do what they can to make that happen. It's the rare one who actually can successfully clean house.
Yes. He's set up to fail, experienced CEO types won't take that job. He needs to clean house, be hated, and fired, to set up the next CEO for rebuilding. OTOH, by our standards, his bank account will do OK, I'm sure. I'm sure he knows this as well as we do.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #217
He's got to fire a lot of people, and he can't do it all at once. So his challenge is to figure out who needs to go now, and who can go later. Some people would best serve Boeing by having their heads on pikes. Figuring out who is why he gets the big bucks.
 
  • #219
Flyboy said:
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/08/08/business/boeing-seattle-new-ceo

Well hot damn. We got someone who understands in the big seat.

Maybe there’s hope for the company yet.
I think it just means that he understands public and investor relations. This, by it's self only shows that he knows how to look like he's fixing things. Who else is moving? His staff? Doesn't a Boeing VP fly to many locations each year? Don't they have his cell phone number and email? CEO's walking the floor doesn't mean anything unless your name is Hewlett or Packard and you've previously built an organization that reflects those values.

He's buying time with PR stunts while he, hopefully, fixes real problems that will take a lot longer. It's a sound bite press release IMO, that is all.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #220
Ortberg said he’d be on the factory floor in Renton, Washington, Thursday, where the company makes its troubled 737 Max line of planes.
If he's willing to listen, the factory floor is the first place he needs to be. You can't hear from the workers from 2300 miles away.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, Astronuc and Flyboy
  • #221
DaveE said:
I think it just means that he understands public and investor relations. This, by it's self only shows that he knows how to look like he's fixing things. Who else is moving? His staff? Doesn't a Boeing VP fly to many locations each year? Don't they have his cell phone number and email? CEO's walking the floor doesn't mean anything unless your name is Hewlett or Packard and you've previously built an organization that reflects those values.

He's buying time with PR stunts while he, hopefully, fixes real problems that will take a lot longer. It's a sound bite press release IMO, that is all.
It’s still an improvement over the last few CEOs. And if it is just a PR stunt to buy time to fix the real issues, that’s fine by me.
 
  • #222
Worst case - it's a PR move. That still shows he understands the problem, which is the first step in fixing it.

The next step is to require all the VPs and such who now fly to Seattle do so on a recent Boeing aircraft. That will focus their attention on safety in a hurry.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes Tom.G, Borg, Flyboy and 4 others
  • #223
Vanadium 50 said:
The next step is to require all the VPs and such who now fly to Seattle do so on a recent Boeing aircraft.
And sit by the plugged doors... :wink:
 
  • Haha
Likes Borg and morrobay
  • #224
berkeman said:
And sit by the plugged doors..
If it's Boeing, I am going, going, gone!
 
  • #226
Greg Bernhardt said:
Reuters reports FAA to inspect Boeing 787 planes after mid-air dive, as 777X tests put on hold after structural damage found
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-faa-adopts-safety-directive-204442367.html
Separately, Boeing said Monday it had halted test flights on its 777-9 that is awaiting certification after a component between the engine and airplane structure was identified as failing to perform during a maintenance check.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/boeings-latest-mishap-cracks-777x-125134825.html

https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...787-planes-following-mid-air-dive-2024-08-19/


Motley Fool: Prediction: Boeing Might Sell Its Defense Business
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/prediction-boeing-might-sell-defense-105000069.html
Things are so bad at Boeing Defense, Space, and Security (BDS) that aerospace analyst Chris Quilty of Quilty Space quipped, "I wouldn't be entirely surprised if they spun out or sold the Defense & Space business as a way to mitigate their sprawling problems."
 
  • Sad
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #227
I think it’s a mixed bag if they split their defense and commercial sides. On the one hand, the defense side is doing reasonably well, with multiple contracts currently being worked to varying degrees of success (glares at KC-46 Pegasus). On the other hand, it’s probably their most successful production division at the moment.
 
  • #228
If Boeing is no longer connected to the military industrial complex maybe the Justice department will be more inclined to hold Boeing accountable in the various criminal/civil cases.
 
  • #229
Boeing and Lockheed Martin are in discussions to sell their joint venture, United Launch Alliance (ULA), to Sierra Space, according to sources familiar with the matter. ULA, a key provider of launch services to the U.S. government and a major competitor to SpaceX, could soon shift from being owned by two of the largest defense contractors to a smaller, privately held company.
https://themachinemaker.com/news/bo...-sell-united-launch-alliance-to-sierra-space/

I read about this in a Reuters article.
https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...artin-talks-sell-ula-sierra-space-2024-08-16/
 
  • #230
Interesting CNN article today with the perspective of one of the pilots flying the plane when the door plug blew:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/12/business/alaska-airlines-pilot-i-was-in-shock/index.html

“I opened the flight deck door. And I saw quiet. Hundreds of eyes staring right back at me. And I looked at my flight attendants and I said, ‘Are you okay?’ And in that response, I heard: ‘hole,’ ‘four, five empty seats’ and ‘injuries.’”

Wiprud said she thought people were blown out of the plane. But the flight crew was quickly able to determine that all passengers and crew were accounted for.

<<snip>>

She said the noise from the air whooshing through the plane was “so incredibly loud,” and, after she put on her oxygen mask, Wiprud said she couldn’t hear anything on her headset. The reason: Her headset was no longer on her head. It had gotten ripped off as the cabin was depressurized.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top