Kilo Unit Naming Confusion: kW vs KW

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blenton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the naming conventions of the kilo unit, specifically the use of lowercase 'k' in 'kW' (kilowatts) compared to uppercase letters used for other metric prefixes like mega (MWh) and giga (GWh). Participants explore the historical and practical reasons behind these conventions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why 'k' is lowercase in 'kW' while other prefixes like 'M' and 'G' are uppercase, suggesting a potential historical reason related to the standardization of unit prefixes.
  • Another participant notes that 'k' may have predated the standardization and that there are other lowercase prefixes like 'h' for hecto and 'da' for deca.
  • It is mentioned that the uppercase 'K' is used for Kelvin, which could contribute to confusion in contexts involving temperature.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the commonality of using kilo with Kelvin, questioning the practicality of terms like 'kK' and suggesting that using electronvolts (eV) might be more appropriate at high temperatures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the use of kilo with Kelvin and the implications of unit naming conventions. There is no consensus on the reasons behind the lowercase 'k' or the practicality of using kilo with Kelvin.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various unit conventions and their historical context, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying reasons for the naming conventions or the practical applications of kilo in relation to Kelvin.

Blenton
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Got a question on the naming of the kilo unit.

Lets say I've got a battery at 1 kWh capacity, the k is lower case. However MWh, mega is capitalised, so is GWh, TWh.

Now on the other end of the scale i can understand it is lower case, mWh, μWh, nWh. And for the large end of the scale, the symbols are upper case, except for kilo.

So why is it not KW instead of kW?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know for sure, it could be one of various reasons, including natural evolution.

It could be that kilo pre-dates the standardization of the entire set of prefixes by many years of usage and they did not want to change 'k' when they put together the entire set.

By the way, kilo is not the only lower case prefix on the 'larger' side of the scale, there is also 'h' hecto (x100) and 'da' deca (x10).

And a kelvin is already upper case k, 'K'. Notice that a kelvin is not even a degree, it is just a kelvin; as opposed to Fahrenheit and celsius, which are degrees.

I think the whole point is to minimize confusion so that when you see a unit symbol you should be able to tell exactly what it is with minimal or no problem.

I don't know if you know this, but regarding upper and lower case, there is something else you may want to know/be-aware-of...units named after the names of scientists also start with upper case:

V
A
W
S
K
°F
°C
...to list a few

and when you write such units, they need to be written out in lower case, after all, they refer to the unit and not the scientist him/her-self. For example, 25W is written out 25 watts, not 25 Watts

Hope this helps.
 
Blenton said:
Hi guys,

Got a question on the naming of the kilo unit.

Lets say I've got a battery at 1 kWh capacity, the k is lower case. However MWh, mega is capitalised, so is GWh, TWh.

Now on the other end of the scale i can understand it is lower case, mWh, μWh, nWh. And for the large end of the scale, the symbols are upper case, except for kilo.

So why is it not KW instead of kW?

As gsal mentions, "K" is used for Kelvin.

Also, in computer science, K=1024, which is not to be confused with k=1000.
 
Interesting, thanks guys.

However I don't see it common that one would use kilo with kelvin, 10 kK?
 
Blenton said:
Interesting, thanks guys.

However I don't see it common that one would use kilo with kelvin, 10 kK?

Once you get to kiloKelvins, I think you're better off using eV.

BBB
 
bbbeard said:
Once you get to kiloKelvins, I think you're better off using eV.

BBB

That's a nasty stutter you have there, but the observation is neat. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K