Kinematic One-D Problem: Calculating Total Distance Run by Dog in Morning Run

  • Thread starter Thread starter saac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a woman running to a river located 4 km away while her dog runs back and forth at a different speed. The objective is to determine the total distance run by the dog during the time it takes the woman to reach the river.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating the time it takes for both the woman and the dog to reach the river, with some suggesting different methods to find the total distance run by the dog.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen various attempts to calculate the dog's distance, with some participants questioning the relevance of the woman's position when the dog reaches the river. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between speed, time, and distance, with hints provided to focus on the total time the dog runs.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through assumptions about the problem setup, particularly regarding the dog's path and the timing of the woman's run. The complexity of the problem has led to some confusion, highlighting the need for clarity in understanding the relationship between the variables involved.

saac
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A women and her dog are out for a morning run to the river, which is located 4km away. The women runs at 2.5m/s in a straight line. The dog is unleashed and runs back and forth at 4.5m/s between his owner and the river, until the women reaches the river. What is the total distance run by the dog?

Homework Equations


Average speed=d/t
not sure what else.


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that you have to figure out the total time it takes the dog to make it to the river. Which is 888.9s(4000m/4.5m/s). Then calculate where the women is when the dog reaches the river. So 2.5m/s*888.9=2222.25m... I do not know how to calculate the dogs return to the women while she is still moving at 2.5m/s. Help please. Got a week to learn kinematics
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could do it that way - and solve for the infinite sum ... or you can realize that the distance the dog runs is equal to the speed of the dog multiplied by the time the dog runs for :)
 
So would the distance the dog has to travel 4000m-2222.25(where women is when dog reaches river)

So d=4.5m/s*888.9s? that brings me back to the total distance. Or would d=4.5m/s*395.1s? the 395.1s obtained by taking 4000m-2222.25m=1777.75m then t=1777.75m/4.5m/s=395.1s? Am I on the right track...
 
Last edited:
Nope - you are doing the opposite of what I said: the path the dog followed doesn't matter.
If the dog runs at speed v for time t, then the total distance the dog runs is d=vt
You are given v. You need t. Find t.

You'll kick yourself when you see it.
Hint: the other things you know are the speed of the woman and the distance to the river.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure how to word this but here's what i got...1777.75(distance the women is from the river once the has arrived)/2.5m/s(her rate)=711.1s(time it will take for her to arrive). Then i used that time to solve for the dogs D- d=4.5m/s*711.1s= 3199.95m. If i take this distance and add to it the distance the dog has already traveled(4000m) i end up with 7199.95 for the total distance the dog has traveled. Closer?

been kicking...
 
ARGH! Where women is when dog reaches river DOES NOT MATTER!

I cannot think of a clearer way to put it without doing your homework for you.
Use d=(4.5)t ... you need to find t ... focus on that.
Forget about where the woman is at special times.

You have to find what t is from the other information supplied.
You are given the speed of the woman and the distance to the river ... if only there was a way to find the time from the speed and the distance?!

(BTW: your answer is nearly there - but your reasoning is way wayy over complicated.)
 
Last edited:
so find the time for both? t=4000/2.5= 1600 & t=4000/4.5=888.9 then the difference between the two, 1600-888.9=711.1. I'll use this time to find the dogs distance? 711.1*4.5...and the rest is the same a my last post.

my apologies for my complex "reasoning". got to work out the bad before you usher in the good, right? lol
 
Why do you need the difference between the two times?
(This is like watching a pro golfer continue to miss an easy putt.)

Remember - the path of the dog does not make any difference.
I could say: the woman walks to the river - the dog runs to a distant tree and back to the woman.
What is the total distance the dog runs?

You need to give up these preconceptions young padawan :)
Put pen and paper away and sit back and clear your mind - you are too stuck on needing a difference in something - times, distances, whatever. When you are calm, clear these things will become.

On the time, you will focus... on the time...
The dog has a limited amount of time to run around in.
(pause - breathe - your brain will want to go joyously about it: stop - calm - focus.)

The dog starts running when? ... when the woman begins her journey.
The dog finishes running when?... when the woman ends her journey.
So - how much time is that?

This is actually an important conceptual lesson - absolutely everyone starts out stuck in the same sort of mindset you are in.
The point of the exercise is to create a paradigm shift ... which is hard and painful but worth it the shift is - yes.
 
Last edited:
Ah damn slightly shocked i didn't notice that. so dog is moving for 1600s at 4.5m/s. d=1600s*4.5m/s=7200m

Certainly is a time consuming and painful shift. Thanks though!
 
  • #10
Ah but now you can go find your classmates and watch them struggle through the same thing! Srsly - nobody sees it. The question is asked in a way that is designed to misdirect your attention to things that don't matter. You will also meet the effect when examining pseudoscience claims - particularly in the free-energy crowd. However, it is usually the way with real life problems - they don't come packaged, so you have to look through them to find out what is important. It is an art.

Now you are going to have trouble not seeing it.

Notice how you kept almost getting it right and just missing?
The closest you got was 7199.95m - due to rounding errors.
If you have a look at that you'll see how you got so close.

The main lesson is about overcomplicating the situation.
 
  • #11
Well you are right- It is an art. I'll keep trying, although the struggle will never end...btw you must have oodles of patience to deal with all the noob questions, or more specifically, the noobs doing the questions.
 
  • #12
There are no stupid questions - they are clues to understanding.

I've never had to do this one in text before - f2f I've had students actually sitting cross-legged and going "om" to reset their minds. When I'm right there I can do things like point and wave my arms so I was at a bit of a loss.

From here you should feel better about puzzles.
Go find some to do.
Have fun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K