Kinematics-Boulder Falling Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter SChiO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving a boulder falling under the influence of gravity, specifically focusing on how far it falls in a given time frame of 2 seconds, while neglecting air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of kinematic equations and question the initial conditions, particularly the initial speed of the boulder. There is a discussion about the role of gravity in determining the boulder's acceleration and speed during free fall.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about initial conditions and discussing the implications of constant acceleration due to gravity. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of kinematic equations, but no consensus has been reached on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of specific information regarding the initial speed of the boulder, leading to assumptions that it may be zero. The only additional context provided is a diagram of the boulder falling near a cliff.

SChiO
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but I need help understanding this question...
Discounting air friction, approximately how far will the boulder have fallen in 2 seconds?

a. 20m
b. 45m
c. 30m
d. 90m

Homework Equations



x-x_0 = v_0t + 1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I know this is just a plug and chug equation and the answer is 45m (B). My question is more in understanding the physics behind using this equation...
Originally i used a=Δv/Δt then plugged my found velocity into v=d/t but that gives me 40m, which is not an option.
How do I know when to use which?

Thanks for any help in clarifying this for me! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Discounting air friction, approximately how far will the boulder have fallen in 2 seconds?"

Is that the entire question, or did they give any specifics as the the boulders initial speed? If the initial speed is zero, then you are considering tthe case in which an object has started at some position above the ground. You should be thinking about just as the boulder starts to fall, and what is happening during the fall.

While the boulder is in free fall, what is governing the speed at which its falling?
 
Last edited:
No other information was given. A picture of a boulder falling near a cliff was the only other thing given.

But while the boulder is in free fall isn't it just gravity that's controlling the speed?
 
SChiO said:
No other information was given. A picture of a boulder falling near a cliff was the only other thing given.

But while the boulder is in free fall isn't it just gravity that's controlling the speed?

Yes.what else do you know about the problem?

EDIT: I'm sorry, what your first attempt should have given you is the correct answer as well. you may have just made an arithmetic error. both [itex]x = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2[/itex] and manipulating [itex]a = \frac{v_f - v_i}{t_f - t_i}[/itex] and using [itex]v = \frac{d}{t}[/itex] yield the same results
 
Last edited:
Oh I see...well if the only force really acting on the boulder is gravity that means i have constant acceleration, right? And I'm now remembering that the correct equation for this problem is one used under constant acceleration...
 
SChiO said:
Oh I see...well if the only force really acting on the boulder is gravity that means i have constant acceleration, right? And I'm now remembering that the correct equation for this problem is one used under constant acceleration...

Yes, now if we let the downward direction be the positive direction, then we see that, like you said, [itex]a = g[/itex].

so the equation now becomes [itex]x-x_0 = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}gt^2[/itex].

so you know that the only force acting on the boulder is gravity and thus it is experiencing constant acceleration. but you also know the initial speed, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
matineesuxxx said:
Yes, now if we let the downward direction be the positive direction, then we see that, like you said, [itex]a = g[/itex].

so the equation now becomes [itex]x-x_0 = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}gt^2[/itex].

so you know that the only force acting on the boulder is gravity and thus it is experiencing constant acceleration. but you also know the initial speed, right?

As he said earlier,the value of initial speed is not given. Only a diagram is given. So you can safely assume the velocity to be zero. If my assumption IS correct,then the answer is A) 20m/s
 
Arka420 said:
As he said earlier,the value of initial speed is not given. Only a diagram is given. So you can safely assume the velocity to be zero. If my assumption IS correct,then the answer is A) 20m/s

Yes, That's what I was getting at and why I said SChiO must have made an arithmetic error. I just didn't want to give it away. I can only assume SChiO figured it out by now..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K