Kinetic and heat energy problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the coefficient of friction and the kinetic and heat energy of a box being pushed along a level surface. It concludes that as the coefficient of friction (\mu) increases, the final kinetic energy decreases while the heat energy increases, making option (c) the correct answer. The reasoning is based on the understanding that increased friction requires more work to maintain motion, leading to a conversion of kinetic energy into heat energy. The context of how the box is pushed—whether with constant speed or acceleration—also influences the outcome.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy equations, specifically E_k = mv²/2
  • Knowledge of frictional force calculations, including F_F = \mu F_N
  • Familiarity with work-energy principles, particularly W = Fd
  • Concept of energy conversion between kinetic and thermal energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of varying coefficients of friction on kinetic energy in physics experiments
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Explore practical applications of friction in engineering, such as braking systems
  • Investigate the relationship between work done and energy transformation in different scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of energy conversion and friction in real-world applications.

temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a box is pushed along a level surface, what could be said if the coefficient of fricion(\mu) increases?

a) Final kinetic energy increases and heat energy increases
b) Final kinetic energy increases and heat energy decreases
c) Final kinetic energy decrease and heat energy increases
d) Final kinetic energy decreases and heat energy decreases

Homework Equations


E_k = \frac{mv_2} {2}

F_F = \mu F_N

W = Fd

The Attempt at a Solution


I think that the answer is a), because if the coefficient of friction increases, the force of friction increases, which means that more work would be needed to overcome this friction. Therefore, kinetic energy will increase since it is equivalent to work. Also, heat energy increases because if the force of friction increases it is general knowledge that more heat will be produced. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It all depends how the box is pushed. If it's just given an initial speed and let go, then (c) is correct. Part of the KE is converted to heat energy.
 
The box has an initial speed of zero, and is pushed across the distance the entire way. I just forgot to mention that.
 
Last edited:
How is it pushed? With constant speed? With constant accn? What is meant by "the co-eff of friction increases"? Does it increase along the path? Or are you comparing two separate cases when the co-effs are different?

Please formulate the problem precisely.
 
Well, this is a question I had on a test, so I can't remember the question word for word, but I think that the box is pushed with constant acceleration and that you are comparing two separate cases when the coefficients are different. My question wasn't very precise itself, so I might not be completely right.
 
If the actual accn in both cases are same, then obviously the box has same speed and hence same KE at the end in both cases. But the heat generated is more when the co-eff of friction is more.

A more practical question would be when they are pushed with the same force. Then the right ans would be (c) again, don't you think?
 
Actually I just remembered that the coeffecient of friction was increasing while the box was being pushed.
 
Well, then final KE decreases with respect to what? With respect to the case where the co-eff would have stayed constant, presumably. And we still don't know which is constant -- force, accn or speed or something else!

Anyway, since increase in the co-eff of friction always lead to generation of more heat at the expense of the loss of KE, the ans (c) still is the most reasonable one.

Enough about this one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K