Kinetic energy and frames of refrence

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of kinetic energy and the implications of different frames of reference in its measurement. Participants explore how kinetic energy is defined and calculated based on the observer's frame of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions which frame of reference is appropriate for measuring kinetic energy. Some participants discuss the implications of changing frames and how it affects the calculated kinetic energy of a moving car.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the consistency of kinetic energy calculations across different frames. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider all quantities in the chosen frame, and there is recognition of the complexity introduced by changing frames.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific values and calculations related to a car's mass, speed, and fuel consumption, which may be subject to varying interpretations based on the chosen frame of reference. Participants also note the importance of unit consistency in calculations.

chuy
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi!

When we measure the Kinetic energy, which is the correct frame of reference that we must choose?

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chuy said:
Hi!

When we measure the Kinetic energy, which is the correct frame of reference that we must choose?

Thanks :smile:
You may choose any frame you like so long as you also measure all quantities of interest in that frame. I.e. Kinetic energy is an observer defined quantity.

Pete
 
Thank you

But I'm a little confused.

For example. A car with mass M=1000kg Initially in rest with respect to the ground accelerates until reaching v=50m/s. Use a fuel that renders R=50 000J/kg (1kg of fuel becomes 50000 jouls)

[tex]E=\Delta K=\frac{1}{2}Mv^2=mR[/tex] (m is the mass of fuel that the car spend)

[tex]m=\frac{Mv^2}{2R}=25kg[/tex]

But if we change the frame of reference (also inertial) the car spends different fuel :confused:

What happens?
 
Last edited:
changing frame of reference does not chance anything. Your car is initially at rest v_i=0m/s and accelerates to v_f=50km/h=13.89m/s. that gives you the diffrence in kinetic energy \Delta K= 0.5M(v_f-v_i)^2.

If you are in a frame of refrence moving at 5m/s relative to the ground, the car is not initially at rest, but is moving with a speed v_i=-5m/s and accelerates to v_f=8.89m/s. Thus, the diffrence in kinetic energy is the same. (Remember to be consistent with your units, and transform km/h into m/s before you do your calulations - your value for m is wrong)
 
Thank you for you answer :biggrin:

Sorry, I will change m/s instead of km/s.
 
Triss said:
changing frame of reference does not chance anything. Your car is initially at rest v_i=0m/s and accelerates to v_f=50km/h=13.89m/s. that gives you the diffrence in kinetic energy \Delta K= 0.5M(v_f-v_i)^2.
Careful! This reasoning is incorrect; in general:
[tex]\Delta{KE} \ne \frac{1}{2}m (v_f - v_i)^2[/tex]

Instead:
[tex]\Delta{KE} = \frac{1}{2}m (v_f^2 - v_i^2)[/tex]

Yes, the change in KE of the car does depend on the reference frame used; to understand what's going on, you need to consider the change in KE of everything, including the Earth itself. Here's a post that might help: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1006609&postcount=12
 
Well, if we change of frame of reference by other that one moves to -5m/s relative to ground. The initial speed of the car in that frame of reference will be v_0=5m/s and the end v_f=55m/s
[tex]E=\Delta K=\frac{1}{2}Mv_f^2-\frac{1}{2}Mv_0^2=\frac{1}{2}M(v_f^2-v_0^2)=\frac{1}{2}M(55^2-5^2)=1.5\times 10^6 J[/tex]

[tex]m_{fuel}=\frac{1.5\times 10^6 J}{R}=30kg[/tex]

It spent different fuel. :bugeye:

Kind regards :smile:

Edit:
Thanks Doc Al. I see that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K