Kinetic Energy Change in Particle: Earth vs Space Observation

Click For Summary
The change in kinetic energy of a particle subjected to a constant force will be perceived differently from distinct inertial reference frames, such as Earth and a spaceship. When observing the same particle, the work done on it and the resulting kinetic energy change will yield different values in each frame due to the principles of relativity. Energy is part of a four-vector, meaning that energy and its changes are not conserved across different Lorentz systems. Thus, calculations of kinetic energy will differ based on the observer's frame of reference. This highlights the complexity of energy measurements in relativistic contexts.
HungryChemist
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Alright, I was wondering if Change in Kinetic energy of a particle (after undergoing a constant force acting on it) would be oberserved to be the different value measured from two different inertial reference frames.

Here's one particular case...Say you're on Earth and I on a space ship. We are both observing the same particle in the space and there's a force action on the particlee. The particle displace it self through surface, therefore there's work done on the particle due to the force and therefore it will change it's kinetic energy. But, would that change in kinetic energy of the particle agree if you were to do the same calculation from the spaceship?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is one component of a four-vector.
So energy and change in energy will be different in different Lorentz systems.
 
The answer is yes, the calculation would be different. Additionally, no one ever said that energy is conserved when changing reference frames.
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K