Kirchhoff's 2nd Law: Terminal PD Calculation Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter Janiceleong26
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd law Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating terminal potential difference (p.d.) for two cells, A and B, in a circuit using Kirchhoff's 2nd Law. For cell A, the terminal p.d. is calculated as the e.m.f. minus the p.d. across its internal resistance, resulting in Va = 4.4 - (0.24 x 2.3). Conversely, for cell B, the terminal p.d. is the e.m.f. plus the p.d. across its internal resistance, leading to Vb = 2.1 + (1.8 x 0.24). The confusion arises from the orientation of cell B, which is connected in reverse, affecting the sign of its contribution to the circuit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Knowledge of terminal potential difference calculations
  • Familiarity with internal resistance in electrical circuits
  • Basic proficiency in Ohm's Law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law in complex circuits
  • Learn about the effects of internal resistance on battery performance
  • Explore advanced circuit analysis techniques, including mesh and nodal analysis
  • Investigate the impact of battery orientation on circuit behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, educators teaching circuit analysis, and anyone interested in understanding battery behavior in electrical circuits.

Janiceleong26
Messages
276
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


image.jpg
image.jpg

For part (iv) 2 and 3 of this question, I don't understand why for 2) terminal p.d. of A is the e.m.f of A minus the p.d. across the internal resistance of A i.e. Va = 4.4-(0.24x2.3), I=0.24A
But for 3) the terminal p.d. is the e.m.f of B PLUS the p.d. across the internal resistance of B i.e. Vb= 2.1+(1.8x0.24)

Homework Equations


ΣE.m.f = Σp.d. around a closed circuit

The Attempt at a Solution


I minus the p.d. across the internal resistance to the e.m.f. for both cases. I can't to seem to see why is this wrong..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have never solved such an exercise, but since you provide the answers, I would guess the folllowing:

Cell B is connected reversely in the circuit. Thus, the pd of B is actually the voltage DROP it contributes to the circuit. Thus, its resistor actually enhances its pd.
Indeed, if you swap cell A with emf 3.848 and no resistor, and cell B with emf 2.532 and no resistor, you would get a total emf 1.316, which divided by 5.5 gives the current of 0.24A.

If you minus the pd across the internal resistor, this is wrong because it is actually one time with and one time versus the circuit loop.
What I would have done (and don't know if it would be considered wrong) is give cell B's pd as a negative value.
 
Once you apply KVL over the loop, you'll figure out the current's value and its direction is COUNTER clock wise. Now, if you want to add two series voltages up, you simply need to add the values of these voltages up, BUT you MUST consider the polarities.
In your case,
Cell A:
Since the current direction is counter clock wise, then it will pass Cell A from the right to the left. It will meet the resistance first (with positive sign)and then it will meet the negative terminal of the voltage source (negative sign).
(0.24*2.3 - 4.4 ) = - 3.848 V , the negative sign means the current will first meet the negative terminal of the new voltage.

Cell B:
The current will meet first the positive terminal of the voltage source (positive sign) and then it will find the resistance (positive sign too). As a result, we do the following
(0.24*1.8 + 2.1) = 2.532 V, similarly, the positive sign means the current will initially meet the positive terminal of the new voltage.

I hope this helps a bit.

Best regrads,
G.P.
 
[
Gmen said:
I have never solved such an exercise, but since you provide the answers, I would guess the folllowing:

Cell B is connected reversely in the circuit. Thus, the pd of B is actually the voltage DROP it contributes to the circuit. Thus, its resistor actually enhances its pd.
Indeed, if you swap cell A with emf 3.848 and no resistor, and cell B with emf 2.532 and no resistor, you would get a total emf 1.316, which divided by 5.5 gives the current of 0.24A.

If you minus the pd across the internal resistor, this is wrong because it is actually one time with and one time versus the circuit loop.
What I would have done (and don't know if it would be considered wrong) is give cell B's pd as a negative value.
how do you know which internal resistor is versus or with?
 
GoodPost said:
Once you apply KVL over the loop, you'll figure out the current's value and its direction is COUNTER clock wise. Now, if you want to add two series voltages up, you simply need to add the values of these voltages up, BUT you MUST consider the polarities.
In your case,
Cell A:
Since the current direction is counter clock wise, then it will pass Cell A from the right to the left. It will meet the resistance first (with positive sign)and then it will meet the negative terminal of the voltage source (negative sign).
(0.24*2.3 - 4.4 ) = - 3.848 V , the negative sign means the current will first meet the negative terminal of the new voltage.

Cell B:
The current will meet first the positive terminal of the voltage source (positive sign) and then it will find the resistance (positive sign too). As a result, we do the following
(0.24*1.8 + 2.1) = 2.532 V, similarly, the positive sign means the current will initially meet the positive terminal of the new voltage.

I hope this helps a bit.

Best regrads,
G.P.
For Cell A:
I thought Counter clockwise would be from left to right?
For cell B:
Which is the new voltage you are referring to?
 
Hhhh ...
I dunno, in my room the clock moves from left to right ><
...
New voltage = voltage source + voltage across the resistor inside the cell.

G.P.
 
GoodPost said:
Hhhh ...
I dunno, in my room the clock moves from left to right ><
...
New voltage = voltage source + voltage across the resistor inside the cell.

G.P.
Huh? I thought all clocks moves from right to left?? I.e. Clockwise?? :oldconfused:
Ok thanks so much
 
if this is confusing you do it the easy way

take out one of the batteries (leave its resistance in )

you will have a 4.4V source feeding a 9.6 ohm resistance. Work out the current A

swap the battery, you have 2.1 V source feeding a 9.6 ohm resistance. Work out the current B

total current = A - B (they subtract rather than add because the batteries oppose)now the PDs you want are just ohms law. you know current i; you know resistance R
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janiceleong26
Janiceleong26 said:
Huh? I thought all clocks moves from right to left?? I.e. Clockwise?? :oldconfused:
^^
Janiceleong26 said:
Ok thanks so much
You're welcome, all the best wishes.

G.P.
 
  • #10
William White said:
if this is confusing you do it the easy way

take out one of the batteries (leave its resistance in )

you will have a 4.4V source feeding a 9.6 ohm resistance. Work out the current A

swap the battery, you have 2.1 V source feeding a 9.6 ohm resistance. Work out the current B

total current = A - B (they subtract rather than add because the batteries oppose)now the PDs you want are just ohms law. you know current i; you know resistance R
Thanks! That was clear! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K