Kirchhoff's current law and nodal analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and nodal analysis to solve for the current I in a specific circuit. The user initially calculated a current of (35/22)A using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) but encountered issues when applying KCL, resulting in contradictory equations. The equations derived were 4i1 + 2i2 + 4i3 = 5, -4i3 - 2i4 = -10, and nodal analysis equations -i2 + i3 - i4 = 0 and i1 + i4 = I. The user received feedback suggesting a clearer diagram and proper equation formulation to resolve the discrepancies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Knowledge of nodal analysis techniques
  • Basic circuit theory concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) applications in circuit analysis
  • Study nodal analysis methods for solving complex circuits
  • Practice drawing circuit diagrams with labeled currents and voltages
  • Explore common pitfalls in circuit analysis and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in circuit analysis and troubleshooting.

jonmondalson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm looking to work out the current at I in the following circuit using Kirchoff's current law and nodal analysis:
[PLAIN]http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/4792/circuitgem.jpg

Using Kirchoff's voltage law (and loop analysis), I got a current of (35/22)A, but for the current law method I'm having problems.

I obtained the following equations using Kirchoff's current law:
4i1+2i2+4i3=5
-4i3-2i4=-10
and nodal analysis:
-i2+i3-i4=0
i1+i4=I

But solving these 4 equations produces a value for I of 0, which doesn't make sense, let alone agree with the answer using the other method.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I got as far as your first equation and have no idea how you got it. (Actually, I think I know, but it's nonsensical)

Try drawing the I's and V's out on the diagram and writing equations that make sense.

It's a VERY straightforward problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K