Klein-Gordon operator on a time-ordered product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the equation (\Box + m^{2})<|T(\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y))|>=-i\delta^{(4)}(x-y) using the Klein-Gordon operator on the time-ordered product T(\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y)). The user applies the operator \Box, defined as \partial_{0}^{2}-\nabla^{2}, and utilizes the product rule for derivatives. The challenge arises when applying the equal-time commutation relation [\phi(x),\dot{\phi}^{\dagger}(y)] = i\delta^{(3)}(x-y), as the user encounters unexpected positive signs in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, specifically time-ordered products.
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon operator and its components, \Box = \partial_{0}^{2}-\nabla^{2}.
  • Knowledge of delta functions and their properties in the context of distributions.
  • Proficiency in applying equal-time commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation and its implications in quantum field theory.
  • Study the properties and applications of time-ordered products in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the role of delta functions in quantum field theory and their use in calculations.
  • Examine the implications of equal-time commutation relations on field operators and their derivatives.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, particularly those working on the Klein-Gordon equation and time-ordered products, will benefit from this discussion.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey guys,

So here's the problem I'm faced with. I have to show that

[itex](\Box + m^{2})<|T(\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y))|>=-i\delta^{(4)}(x-y)[/itex],

by acting with the quabla ([itex]\Box[/itex]) operator on the following:

[itex]T(\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y))=\theta(x_{0}-y_{0})\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y)+\theta(y_{0}-x_{0})\phi^{\dagger}(y)\phi(x)[/itex]

Homework Equations


[itex]\partial_{0}\theta(x_{0}-y_{0})=\delta(x_{0}-y_{0})[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


So I've split the quabla into its time and spatial derivatives: [itex]\Box = \partial_{0}^{2}-\nabla^{2}[/itex] and I'm applying the time derivative first, using the product rule:

[itex] \partial_{0}T(\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y))<br /> =\delta(x_{0}-y_{0})\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y) +\theta(x_{0}-y_{0})\dot{\phi}(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y)\\<br /> +\theta(x_{0}-y_{0})\phi(x)\dot{\phi}^{\dagger}(y) -\delta(x_{0}-y_{0})\phi^{\dagger}(y)\phi(x)<br /> +\theta(y_{0}-x_{0})\dot{\phi}^{\dagger}(y)\phi(x) +\theta(y_{0}-x_{0})\phi^{\dagger}(y)\dot{\phi}(x)[/itex]

However, the two delta terms vanish as the commutator of two fields is 0. so I'm left with

[itex] \partial_{0}T(\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y))<br /> =\theta(x_{0}-y_{0})\dot{\phi}(x)\phi^{\dagger}(y) +\theta(x_{0}-y_{0})\phi(x)\dot{\phi}^{\dagger}(y)\\<br /> +\theta(y_{0}-x_{0})\dot{\phi}^{\dagger}(y)\phi(x) +\theta(y_{0}-x_{0})\phi^{\dagger}(y)\dot{\phi}(x)[/itex]

At this point I'm meant to be using the equal-time commutation relation: [itex][\phi(x),\dot{\phi}^{\dagger}(y)] = i\delta^{(3)}(x-y)[/itex] but all my signs are positive...so what do I do?

Thanks guys...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K