Koszul Connexion: Explained Simply

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Calabi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of a Koszul connection in the context of vector bundles, specifically seeking clarification on its definition and properties. Participants express confusion regarding the explanations provided in both French and English Wikipedia articles, and they explore the implications of certain mathematical terms and concepts related to the connection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a clearer understanding of the Koszul connection, mentioning the relationship between a vector bundle, a vector field, and a section.
  • Another participant suggests that the English Wikipedia article is clear, prompting a discussion about the clarity of the French version.
  • There is a preference expressed for the French formulation of the concept, but participants note that it lacks clarity, particularly regarding the definition and range of a function denoted as f.
  • A participant explains that f is a smooth function and clarifies that X is a tangent vector, while S is a section of a vector bundle, not necessarily the tangent bundle.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of specification regarding the domain and codomain of the function f, leading to further inquiries about the definitions used in the articles.
  • Another participant emphasizes that a global section of a vector bundle may not exist without zeros, but it can be approximated by a section that is zero outside a neighborhood.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and preference for different language versions of the Wikipedia articles. There is no consensus on the clarity of the definitions provided, and multiple viewpoints regarding the interpretation of the function f remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the definitions provided in the articles, particularly concerning the specification of the function f's domain and codomain, as well as the implications of sections in vector bundles.

Calabi
Messages
140
Reaction score
2
Hell every body, do you know what is a Koszul connexion please? WIkipédia francais is not clear
about that for me.

I just know if I have a vectorial bundle [tex]\pi : E \rightarrow B[/tex], a vectorial field X on B and a section S on B. A connexion associate at those 2 object an other section.

But it's nt clear.

Thank you in advance and have a nice afternoon:oldbiggrin:.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calabi said:
Hell every body, do you know what is a Koszul connexion please? WIkipédia francais is not clear
about that for me.

I just know if I have a vectorial bundle [tex]\pi : E \rightarrow B[/tex], a vectorial field X on B and a section S on B. A connexion associate at those 2 object an other section.

But it's nt clear.

Thank you in advance and have a nice afternoon:oldbiggrin:.

Did you read the English Wikipedia article? It is very clear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection_(vector_bundle)
 
I prefere the french formulation(whitout the tensor for the moment.). than the english. But the french is not clear. On the french version what is f please?
 
Calabi said:
I prefere the french formulation(whitout the tensor for the moment.). than the english. But the french is not clear. On the french version what is f please?
send me the link
 
Calabi said:
I prefere the french formulation(whitout the tensor for the moment.). than the english. But the french is not clear. On the french version what is f please?

Calabi, f is a smooth function. X is a tangent vector at a point on the manifold. Note that s is a section of a vector bundle - but not necessarily the tangent bundle.

Can you ask some specific questions. I do no want to just repeat what the Wikipedia article is saying.
 
The thing is they don't specifise the definition set and the arrived set of f it's just what's stike me.
That's why I'm wooriing of. Excuse me if you you think I want you to repaet what wikipédia said.
 
Calabi said:
The thing is they don't specifise the definition set and the arrived set of f it's just what's stike me.
That's why I'm wooriing of. Excuse me if you you think I want you to repaet what wikipédia said.

Milles pardons Pour moi, l'article de Wikipedia est précis et sans des questions spécifiques je ne sais pas comment l'expilquer d'une autre manière. (Pardonnez mon mauvais français).

La fonction,f , est défini sur la base,la variété, meme comme le champs de vecteurs.

En general il n'existe pas une section globale d'un fibre vectoriel sans des zeros mais c'est toujours possible de l'éloigner a travers tout le variété en le faisant zero a l'extérieur d'un voisinage ouvert. En ce cas, on ne s'inquiet pas aux zeros mais seulement au voisinage non-zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K