Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates for Kerr metric

  • I
  • Thread starter Dale
  • Start date
  • #1
29,052
5,323

Main Question or Discussion Point

I am having trouble understanding the Kerr metric. One of the things which helped me understand the Schwarzschild metric is the Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates. In particular, the fact that light cones were still at 45 degrees was very helpful, and it was helpful to see that the singularity was a spacelike surface.

Does a similar diagram exist for the Kerr metric?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,670
6,453
  • #3
29,052
5,323
Yes, I have seen those, but I was hoping for something a little more quantitative and less "schematic".
 
  • #4
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
28,301
8,052
Does a similar diagram exist for the Kerr metric?
Section 3.6 of this paper derives Kruskal-like coordinates for Kerr spacetime; section 3.7 presents Penrose diagrams:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.02172.pdf

There is one key thing about Kerr spacetime that the above paper does not appear to mention: a single Kruskal or Penrose diagram, since it only has two coordinates, cannot completely describe the geometry up to symmetries, since Kerr spacetime is not spherically symmetric, it's only axially symmetric. So to fully describe the geometry, up to symmetries, you need multiple Penrose-type diagrams. The most commonly seen one is a diagram of the equatorial plane of Kerr spacetime (that appears to be the one in the above paper), but that by itself doesn't tell you everything.
 

Related Threads on Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates for Kerr metric

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
541
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
6K
Top