Lagrangian equations of particle in rotational paraboloid

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the motion of a particle on the inner wall of a rotational paraboloid. The participant successfully derived the Lagrangian and the equation of motion for the polar coordinate but struggled with expressing the energy and angular momentum of the particle. They received feedback indicating that the equations of motion needed correction, particularly regarding the angular velocity and the relationship between circular motion and small oscillations. The final expression for the frequency of small oscillations was derived as ω = √(gb/(1 + b²r₀²)), though the participant noted a potential error in their calculations. The thread highlights the complexities of applying Lagrangian mechanics to this specific problem.
Oomph!
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello. I solve this problem:

1. Homework Statement

The particles of mass m moves without friction on the inner wall of the axially symmetric vessel with the equation of the rotational paraboloid:

paraboild.png


where b>0.

a) The particle moves along the circular trajectory at a height of z = z(0).

express:
- Lagrangian
- the equation of motion for the polar coordinate r
- energy of the particle (with m, z(0), b and g only)
- angular momentum of the particle (with m, z(0), b and g only)

b) We slightly deflect the particles downwards. Find the frequency of small oscillations around the original intact trajectory.

2. Relevant equation
Lagrangian equations, equations for energy in conservative field and angular momentum.

The Attempt at a Solution


a) I didn't have any problem with Lagrangian and equation of motion for the polar coordinate r. Here is the result, I know how to do it:
- Lagrangian:
lagrangian.png
(1)
- equation of motion for the polar coordinate r:
equation2.png
(2)

I have problem to express the energy and angular momentrum od particle. I show you my attempt:
equations3.png

So, the problem is that I don't know, how to express the time derivation of Θ.
Could I just say, that the time derivation of Θ is the (gb)^(1/2) because the equation (2) is in standart form where ω^2=gb?

b) Well, I don't have any idea. I just have the result:
frequention.png

And it doesn't make sense if I told that ω^2=gb.

So, please, could you tell me what is wrong and what to do?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • paraboild.png
    paraboild.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 2,401
  • lagrangian.png
    lagrangian.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 1,395
  • equation2.png
    equation2.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 1,382
  • equations3.png
    equations3.png
    48.9 KB · Views: 1,412
  • frequention.png
    frequention.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 1,345
Physics news on Phys.org
You should have two equations of motion, one for the ##\phi## coordinate and another for ##r##.

You should also have ##\ddot{\phi} = 0## in you EOM.

Edit: your equation (2) seems wrong to me you should be getting:

$$0 = (1+b^2r^2)\ddot{r} + 2b^2 r\dot{r}^2+gbr - r\dot{\phi}^2=0$$

But I don't see how you can find ##\dot{\phi}##.
 
Last edited:
Oomph! said:
upload_2017-11-6_14-37-14.png

Check the sign of the second term.

Apply the ##r## equation of motion to the special case of circular motion. (What are ##\dot r## and ##\ddot r## for this case?)

Note: Be sure not to confuse the angular velocity of the circular motion of part (a) with the angular frequency of small oscillations in part (b).
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-6_14-37-14.png
    upload_2017-11-6_14-37-14.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 1,373
So first you can find a solution for your velocity of a circular orbit. Therefore you know ##\dot{r} = \ddot{r} = 0##. From your corrected equation 2 (what TSny wrote) you get:

$$r\dot\varphi = gbr \Rigtharrow v_0=\sqrt{gb}r_0$$

From the other equation you would get, if you've derived the Lagrangian for ##\varphi## you get, that you angular momentum ##L## is constant (central, conservative force).

$$L = m\dot\varphi r^2 = mv_0r_0 \Rightarrow \dot \varphi = \frac{\sqrt{gbr_0^4}}{r^2}$$

This is your expression of $\dot\varphi$ written in terms of the current radius ##r(t)## and the radius ##r_0## of the stable orbit. Putting this into eqaution 2 we get:

$$\ddot r(1+b^2r^2) - b^2r\dot r^2 - \frac{gbr_0^4}{r^3} + gbr = 0$$

Furthermore, for small oscillations we can say: ##r(t) = r_0 + \epsilon(t)## with ##\dot r = \dot\epsilon## and ##\ddot r = \ddot \epsilon## and ##\epsilon << r_0##. Furthermore every term with an ##\epsilon## of higher order than 1 is neglegable. This means ##\epsilon^2 = 0##, ##\dot\epsilon^2 = 0##,##\dot\epsilon\epsilon = 0## ... Doing this we get:

$$\ddot \epsilon (1+b^2r_0^2) - \frac{gbr_0^4}{(r_0+\epsilon)^3} + gbr_0 + gb\epsilon$$

With ##(r_0 + \epsilon)^3 = r_0^3+3r_0^3\epsilon + 0 +0 \approx r_0^3## because ##r_0^3 >> 3r_0^2\epsilon## which leads to the differential equation:

$$\ddot\epsilon -\frac{gb}{1+b^2r_0^2}\cdot r = 0$

So we get

$$\omega = \sqrt{\frac{gb}{1+b^2r_0^2}}$$ = \sqrt{\frac{gb}{1+2bz_0}}

I know I'm missing a 2 in front of the squareroot. I don't know where I lost it
 
  • Like
Likes curious_mind
Please note that this thread is more than five years old and that the OP has not been seen for four years. It is unlikely that your response will be of help at this point but thank you for submitting it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K