Lagrangian mechanics for two springs

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves Lagrangian mechanics applied to a system of two springs supporting two identical masses. The original poster seeks to derive the Lagrangian, determine the equilibrium position, and analyze the normal modes and frequencies of vertical oscillations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the kinetic and potential energies to formulate the Lagrangian. They express concerns about the correctness of their eigenvalue results and the implications of gravitational potential energy changes.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the treatment of gravitational potential energy and its contribution to the overall potential energy in the system. Some guidance has been offered regarding the signs of the energy terms, and the original poster acknowledges the need to revisit their calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of homework constraints regarding the treatment of constant terms in the equations of motion, indicating that the original poster is comparing their approach to provided examples.

wglmb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spring of negligible mass and spring constant k, hanging vertically with one end at a fixed point O, supports a mass m, and beneath it as second, identical spring carrying a second, identical mass.
Using a generalised coordinates the vertical displacements x and y of the masses from their positions with the springs unextended, write down the Lagrangian.
Find the position of equilibrium and the normal modes and frequencies of vertical oscillations.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



KE: [tex]\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2})[/tex]
PE: [tex]mg(l+x)+mg(2l+y)+\frac{1}{2}kx^{2}+\frac{1}{2}k(y-x)^{2}[/tex] [tex]=mg(3l+x+y)+kx^{2}+\frac{1}{2}ky^{2}-kxy[/tex]

Lagrangian: [tex]L=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2})-mg(3l+x+y)-kx^{2}-\frac{1}{2}ky^{2}+kxy[/tex]

Equations of motion:
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}})-\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}=0 \Rightarrow m\ddot{x}+mg+2kx-ky=0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{y}})-\frac{\partial L}{\partial y}=0 \Rightarrow m\ddot{y}+mg+ky-kx=0[/tex]

Know that [tex]B_{ij}\ddot{q}_{j}+A_{ij}q_{j}=0[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow B=\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> m & 0 \\<br /> 0 & m \end{array} \right), A=\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 2k & -k \\<br /> -k & k \end{array} \right)[/tex]

[tex]B^{-1}A=\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{1}{m} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{m} \end{array} \right)\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 2k & -k \\<br /> -k & k \end{array} \right)<br /> =\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{2k}{m} & \frac{-k}{m} \\<br /> \frac{-k}{m} & \frac{k}{m} \end{array} \right)[/tex]

Eigenvalues turn out to be:
[tex]\lambda=\frac{k}{2m}(3+\sqrt{5}) and \lambda=\frac{k}{2m}(3-\sqrt{5})[/tex]

This doesn't look very likely to be right.
Then when I work out the eigenvectors, I get (0,0) in both cases...
... where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you moved the masses down x and y respectively, the strain energies increased as you have indicated, but the gravitational energies also increase?
 
Haven't I got that included in the [tex]mg(3l+x+y)[/tex] part of the PE? This comes from [tex]mg(l+x)+mg(2l+y)[/tex] which is mg times the height of the first particle plus mg times the height of the second.
 
The gravitational potential energy is decreasing with increasing values of x and y, so you need some negative signs.
 
Ah, I see what you mean - of course! I don't have time just now but I'll work that through later and see how I manage :)

Edit:

Hmm, well I still get the same matrices A and B, since they come from the double-dotted terms and the x&y terms. The constant terms (now -mg for both of the equations of motion) aren't used.
I have a feeling those constant terms shouldn't even be there, since none of the examples we've been given have any...
 
Last edited:
It's OK, I've figured it out now. Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K