Lagrangian: singularity in inverted pendulum EoMs?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the equations of motion (EoMs) for an inverted pendulum system involving a point mass on a rigid rod attached to a frictionless carriage. The original equations derived led to an unphysical singularity as the angle θ approached zero. The issue was identified as stemming from the assumption of a massless carriage. By incorporating a nonzero mass M for the carriage, the EoMs were modified to eliminate the singularity, resulting in stable equations that no longer exhibit this problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with equations of motion
  • Knowledge of singularities in physical systems
  • Basic concepts of pendulum dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lagrangian mechanics in detail, focusing on systems with constraints
  • Explore the impact of mass on dynamic systems, particularly in pendulum models
  • Learn about singularities in mechanical systems and how to resolve them
  • Investigate the dynamics of coupled oscillators and their equations of motion
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mechanical engineers, and students studying dynamics and control systems, particularly those interested in the mechanics of pendulums and stability analysis.

Eigenentity
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm doing some analysis of a bicycle mechanics problem and at one point the approximations I'm making mean that the problem reduces to the classic inverted pendulum. I'm very confused, as the equations I've worked out appear to have an unphysical singularity in them, and I can't see where it's coming from.

So, the problem is this: equations of motion of a point mass [tex]m[/tex] on the end of a light rigid rod (length [tex]l[/tex]), the other end of which is attached to a light, frictionless carriage, constrained to move only in the horizontal direction.

So, the problem has two degrees of freedom: [tex]x[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex].

By my reckoning, the position vector of the pendulum bob, counting angle clockwise from the upwards vertical, is:

[tex]\mathbf{r}=(x + l \sin\theta, l \cos\theta)[/tex]

This gives a Lagrangian of:

[tex]L = \frac{m \dot{\mathbf{r}}^2}{2} - m g \cos{\theta} = \frac{m \dot{x}^2}{2} + \frac{m l^2 \dot{\theta}^2}{2} + m \dot{x} \dot{\theta} l \cos{\theta} - m g \cos{\theta}[/tex]

Now, the Euler-Lagrange equations end up as

[tex]\ddot{x} + \ddot{\theta} l \cos{\theta} - \dot{\theta}^2 l \sin{\theta} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\ddot{\theta} + \ddot{x} \cos\theta / l - g \sin\theta/l=0[/tex]

which in turn reduce to:

[tex]\ddot{x} = \frac{\dot{\theta}^2 l - g \cos \theta }{\sin\theta}[/tex]
[tex]\ddot{\theta} = \frac{g / l - \dot{\theta}^2 \cos\theta}{\sin\theta}[/tex]

Do you spot the problem yet? There's a nasty singularity when [tex]\theta \to 0[/tex].

Can anyone tell me what's going wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To anyone wondering, the "unphysical" singularity arises from the unphysical assumption of a light carriage. With a carriage of nonzero mass [tex]M[/tex] the EoMs become:

[tex] \ddot{x} = \frac{2 m \sin \theta \left(g \cos \theta - l \dot{\theta}^2\right)}{2 M + m (1 - \cos 2 \theta)}[/tex]
[tex] \ddot{\theta} = \frac{m l \dot{\theta}^2 \cos \theta-g (m+M)}{- m l \sin \theta - M l / \sin\theta}[/tex]

With no singularity as long as [tex]M \neq 0[/tex]!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K