Landau and Lifshitz Course - any particular order?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Landau and Lifshitz series should generally be read in order, starting with Volume 1: Mechanics, which lays the foundation for subsequent volumes. Volume 3: Classical Theory of Fields is essential before tackling Volume 5: Statistical Physics, as it introduces key concepts like Lagrangians and Hamiltonians that are fundamental in quantum mechanics. Volumes 2, 6, and 8 can be read concurrently as they cover independent topics. Readers should be cautious about print quality, especially from editions published by Elsevier.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangians and Hamiltonians from Volume 1: Mechanics
  • Familiarity with classical field theory from Volume 3: Classical Theory of Fields
  • Knowledge of mathematical concepts such as calculus on manifolds, ordinary differential equations (ODEs), and calculus of variations
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics, particularly for Volume 5: Statistical Physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Volume 1: Mechanics to grasp foundational concepts
  • Read Volume 3: Classical Theory of Fields to understand essential field theories
  • Explore Volume 5: Statistical Physics after completing Volume 3 for insights into quantum mechanics
  • Research print quality issues related to Elsevier editions of Landau and Lifshitz books
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those pursuing engineering or advanced studies, as well as educators and researchers looking to deepen their understanding of classical and quantum mechanics through the Landau and Lifshitz series.

osnarf
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm currently working through volume 1 - mechanics. I'm planning on doing the whole series over the course of the next few years, but there are a few topics I'd like to get to before others. I was just wondering if they are meant to be read one after the other, or if they were just numbered as they were written (or maybe both are true?). Specifically I am wondering about the theory of elasticity, electrodynamics of continuous media (after reading the classical theory of fields), and physical kinetics.

I would really like to get to the theory of elasticity as soon as i can because they constantly claim things to be results of this theory in my engineering classes, and I'd very much like to see how. So are there any of the other books I should do first after mechanics before theory of elasticity, or can I go straight to it? I'm curious also about the other two volumes I mentioned above.

Thanks for your help

Edit: also, if you know of any math prerequisites besides mv calc on the level of calculus on manifolds, ODEs, and calculus of variations that are required, please let me know. Thanks again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
77 Views, no replies - somebody must know, lol. Maybe the post is too long. summary from above:

Are they meant to be read in order 1 to 10 or can you skip around?

Thanks again
 
I'm definitely no expert, but I would say vol 1 should probably come before vol 3 since it introduces lagrangians & hamiltonians, which are fundamental in parts of quantum also. maybe vols 2, 6 & 8 are more or less independent of that, and could maybe be done together, since a lot of it is different names for the same sort of things. the rest I'm even less sure about; like I say, I'm no expert. :rolleyes: If others answered I wouldn't have even tried...
 
I only have the first 4 volumes. I think you could get away with reading 3 before 2. Also, I'm guessing that no other volume depends on 4.

Be careful: when Elsevier (spit) bought out Pergamon, the quality of printings went markedly down. The fine print can be unreadable in some of these pressings.
 
I've only read 1,2, and parts of 3 and 5 so far, but this is what I think:

You should read 1 before any other book.
2, 3, and 5 could be read concurrently. 5 requires some quantum eventually. I read 2 by itself, and now I'm reading 3 and 5 at the same time.
3 should be followed by 4; 5 should by followed by 6, then 7. After finishing all that, move on to 8,9,10 in order.

That's my plan, but not necessarily the only solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K