Laplace DE Problem: Proving Laplace Delta(t-2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hiche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
Hiche
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2r7c9wy.png


Homework Equations



Laplace's transforms.

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so applying the Laplace on both sides yields:

[itex]s^2Y(s) - sy(0) - y'(0) + 2sY(s) - 2y(0) + 10Y(s) = ? + 13 / s - 1[/itex]

Is [itex]e^{-2s} / s[/itex] the Laplace [itex]\delta(t - 2)[/itex]? Our instructor gave us the result of the Lapace but he did not prove it. The only thing he gave us was that the Laplace of [itex]f(t - a)\delta(t - a) = e^{-as}F(s)[/itex]. Can someone point me on how to prove this? It seems our instructor told us that we need to know the proof without him giving it to us. I know that this unit step function is defined to be 0 when 0 <= t < 2 and 1 when t >= 2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure ##\delta(t)## is the unit step function? It typically denotes the Dirac delta function.
 
Yes yes. I mixed up the function. Sorry about that.

So is the Laplace of [itex]\delta(t - 2)[/itex] typically [itex]e^{-2s} / s[/itex]?
 
Which function are you talking about? If it's the delta function, then no, that's not correct. If it's the unit step, then that's right.
 
The delta function. Then is it simply [itex]e^{-2s}[/itex]?

If so, how to prove it starting with [itex]\int^\infty_0 e^{-st}\delta(t - a)dt = e^{as}[/itex]? The proof is apparently required for our exam yet our instructor failed to provide the solution.
 
What's the defining property of the Dirac delta function?
 
..that the [itex]\int^{a+e}_{a-e} f(t)\delta(t - a)dt = f(a)[/itex] for [itex]e > 0[/itex]?

I appreciate your patience but I'm relatively 'new' to this concept.
 
Yup. Just apply that to the Laplace transform integral you have.