Laplace & Fourier: When to Use?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amaresh92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier Laplace
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the appropriate contexts for using the Laplace transform versus the Fourier transform, exploring their similarities and differences in application, particularly in relation to signal analysis in the time and frequency domains.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the Laplace transform is best suited for analyzing exponential responses and poles and zeros in the complex plane.
  • Others argue that the Fourier transform is more appropriate for studying harmonic content and phase in periodic signals.
  • One participant notes that while the Laplace transform maps to the entire complex plane, the Fourier transform is limited to the jω axis.
  • It is mentioned that the double-sided Laplace transform can be considered identical to the continuous Fourier transform under certain substitutions, specifically s = jω.
  • Some signals, such as the unit step function, are highlighted as being easier to analyze with the Laplace transform due to convergence issues that may arise with the Fourier transform.
  • A participant points out that there are common mathematical foundations among the Laplace, Fourier, and Z transforms, which depend on the nature of the signals and their convergence properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express agreement on several points regarding the characteristics and applications of the transforms, but there remains a lack of consensus on the best contexts for their use, indicating multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on limitations related to convergence conditions and the definitions of signals in relation to time, which may affect the applicability of the transforms.

amaresh92
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
greetings,

Can anyone tell me when we should use Laplace transform and Fourier transform? It seems both of them are equal except σ .

thanks in advanced.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Laplace transform resolves a function into moments in the complex plane. It is best used in studies that involve the poles and zeros of a response, such as the exponential responses to an impulse.

The Fourier transform resolves a function into oscillations in the frequency domain. It is best used for the study of harmonic content and phase in repeating signals.

Laplace maps to the complex plane while Fourier maps to the frequency domain. You use the one that takes you from the time domain to your preferred domain for analysis or manipulation.
 
Balun, you can just as well (or better) say that "Laplace maps to the entire complex plane while Fourier maps to the [itex]j \omega[/itex] axis of the complex plane."

it is true that the double-sided Laplace transform is identical to the continuous Fourier transform with the substitution that [itex]s = j \omega[/itex].

there are some signals that, without handwaving, are hard to F.T. while they are easy to L.T. e.g. the unit step function, [itex]u(t)[/itex]. there are issues of convergence and the conditions to get either the Laplace integral or the Fourier integral to converge to a finite result. but where these issues are identical for both the F.T. and L.T. (such as for [itex]x(t) = e^{-\alpha t} u(t)[/itex]), then the transformed result must be the same between the F.T. and L.T. with the substitution of [itex]s = j \omega[/itex].

a similar relationship exists between the Z Transform and the Discrete-Time Fourier Transform. one exists in the entire complex z plane while the other exists on the unit circle of the same z plane, where [itex]z = e^{j \omega}[/itex].

there is a common mathematical underpinning to all of these transforms. it depends on whether your signal in the time or frequency domain is discrete or not. whether you can get the integral to converge or not. whether you define your signals and linear systems to exist before [itex]t=0[/itex] or not (that affects the double or single-sidedness of the integral or summation).
 
rbj; I can agree with everything you write.
I am not a mathematician so it is mostly beyond me.
After three days, amaresh92's question deserved a reply.
So I threw in an answer in the hope that it would stimulate some response.
Now 4 days later, I am enlightened by your interesting reply. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K