Laplace transforms for transient analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around using Laplace transforms for transient analysis in an RC circuit involving a capacitor and a resistor connected in series to a step voltage source. Participants explore how to derive expressions for current and voltage across the capacitor in both the Laplace domain and time domain.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using the formula for voltage across the capacitor as Vc = V(1-e-t/RC) but later acknowledges a calculation error in determining the time constant.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to use Laplace transforms to solve the problem, suggesting that the Laplace domain can model the transient response of the circuit.
  • Participants discuss the appropriate circuit equations and the use of component impedances in the Laplace domain, with some suggesting that the variable 's' should replace 'jω' used in AC circuit analysis.
  • There are inquiries about the correct expressions for current and voltage drops across circuit components, with requests for clarification on taking Laplace transforms of these terms.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the algebra involved in deriving the output voltage and seeks assistance in simplifying expressions.
  • Another participant suggests using partial fractions to simplify the Laplace domain expression for voltage, indicating that this method is necessary for finding the time domain solution.
  • Discussions include corrections on algebraic manipulations and the need for clarity in the use of parentheses to maintain accuracy in calculations.
  • Participants share their findings regarding the inverse Laplace transform and express uncertainty about the correctness of their derived expressions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of using Laplace transforms for the analysis, but there are multiple competing views on the correct algebraic manipulations and methods for deriving the expressions. The discussion remains unresolved with various interpretations and approaches being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about specific algebraic steps and the application of Laplace transforms, indicating that there may be missing assumptions or dependencies on definitions that are not fully addressed in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners interested in circuit analysis, particularly those looking to understand the application of Laplace transforms in transient analysis of electrical circuits.

agata78
Messages
139
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A capacitor of 0.1 F and a resistor of 5 Ω are connected in series; the combination is applied to a step voltage of 20V. Determine the expression for the:

(a) current that flows in the circuit and

(b) the voltage across the capacitor in time domain.

Homework Equations



For question (b)

Would I be correct to use the following equations?

Where:
Vc - is the voltage across the capacitor
V - is the supply voltage
t - is the elapsed time since the application of the supply voltage
RC - is the time constant of the RC charging circuit
e - is the base of the Natural Logarithm = 2.71828

Time Constant
τ = R x C
τ = 5 x 0.5
τ = 2.5 seconds

The voltage formula is given as:
Vc = V(1-e-t/RC)

which equals:
Vc = 20(1-e-t/5)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you expected to do the problem using Laplace transforms (it's in the thread title), or just write down the result from previous knowledge?

EDIT: Also, 5 x 0.1 is not 5.
 
Last edited:
Yes. The general title for these question states 'Use Laplace transforms for the transient analysis of networks'.

Appologies for the typing error.
 
So, the equations you've written are really a result you hope to find using Laplace transforms.

As usual, begin with a circuit equation. Use Laplace domain models for the circuit components and write the appropriate equations...
 
I can't find any appropriate equation for this, i don't have any good example for this.

Can you help?
 
You write your usual circuit equations just as you would for an AC circuit, but use the Laplace domain version of the component impedances. Where you were using 'jω' before in the expressions for inductor and capacitor impedances, just use the variable 's'.

I know it looks silly at first glance, writing AC-type equations for what is apparently a DC circuit, but the Laplace domain's 's' variable takes in all frequencies and can readily model the transient response that happens when a switch closes. You'll see :smile:

You should have in your text or notes the form that a unit step function takes in the Laplace domain. You'll need that to model the 20V source that's suddenly switched on at time t=0.
 
If I(t) is the current at time t, what is the voltage drop across the resistor at time t (in terms of I(t) and R)? What is the voltage drop across the capacitor at time t (in terms of the integral of I(t) with respect to t and C)? Write an equation such that the sum of these two voltage drops is equal to the applied step voltage. Do you know how to take the Laplace Transform of the individual terms in this equation? If so, write the Laplace Transform of the equation.

Chet
 
Z = R + (1 / sC)

Z = 5 + (1 / s x 0.1)

Using Ohms Law:

I(s) = Vin / Z

I(s) = 20/s / 5+(1 / s x 0.1)

However:

Vout(s) = I x (1 / sC)

Vout(s) = I x (1 / s x 0.1)

So:

Vout(s) = [ 20/s / (0.1 + (1 / s x 0.1))] x [1 / s x 0.1]

Vout(s) = 20 / s(s x 0.1 x 0.1 + 1)

Vout(s) = 20 / s(s x 0.01 + 1)

Am i right? What value is s in this example?
 
Last edited:
Something's gone wrong in your algebra when you solved for Vout.

Start by simplifying your Z a bit. Note that 1/(s x 0.1) = 10/s. Makes the numbers easy!

You're going to want to solve for I, so you might as well simplify the expression for I(s) before carrying on to the potential across C. Can you reduce the expression for I(s)?
 
  • #10
To solve Z = R + (1 / sC) i need to add (5 + 10/s) = (10+5s/ s)

for Is= (20s/ 10 +5s) = (20s(10-5s) )/ (10+5s) (10-5s) = (200s - 100s2 ) / (100-25s2)

and if s2=(-1) then

Is= (200s+100) / 125
Is it ok so far?
 
  • #11
Use more parentheses to keep your operations straight.
$$I(s) = \frac{V(s)}{Z(s)} = \frac{20}{s} \left(\frac{s}{5 s + 10}\right) = ~~?$$
 
  • #12
Is= = 20 / 5s+10 = (100s-200) / (25s2 -100)

Is=( 4s-8) /-5
 
Last edited:
  • #13
agata78 said:
Is= = 20 / 5s+10 = (100s-200) / (25s2 -100)

Egads! Just divide the top and bottom of 20 / (5s+10) by five. Hint: It is desirable to have the denominator have factors of the form (s + n).
 
  • #14
This is the same answer I got, but I used a different method. My starting equation was
\frac{\int_0^t{I(t')dt'}}{C}+RI(t)=Vu(t)
where u is the unit step function. Taking the Laplace Transform gives:
\frac{I(s)}{sC}+RI(s)=\frac{V}{s}
Solving for I(s):
I(s)=\frac{V}{R}\frac{1}{\left(s+\frac{1}{RC}\right)}
 
  • #15
Then Is= 4/ (s+2)

Should i calculate now Vout?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
agata78 said:
Then Is= 4/ (s+2)

Should i calculate now Vout?

You could, or you could find I(t) first. You need to provide it as one of the answers...
 
  • #17
It= ( V/R ) ( 1-e (-Rt/L) )

But i don't have L for this equation. Should i find a different one for It?
 
  • #18
agata78 said:
It= ( V/R ) ( 1-e (-Rt/L) )

But i don't have L for this equation. Should i find a different one for It?

There's no inductor in this circuit.

Find I(t) by finding the inverse Laplace transform of the I(s) that you found above. You should have a table of Laplace transforms to work with.
 
  • #19
What is the Laplace Transform of the function eat?
 
  • #20
ok then,

It= 4e -2t

am i right?
 
  • #21
agata78 said:
ok then,

It= 4e -2t

am i right?

Right. And that should be I(t); it's current as a function of time.
 
  • #22
Trying to calculate now Vout:

(4+/ (s+2) ) x (10/s) = 40 / ( s2 +2s)

how to deal with s2
 
  • #23
agata78 said:
Trying to calculate now Vout:

(4+/ (s+2) ) x (10/s) = 40 / ( s2 +2s)

how to deal with s2

Factor the denominator.

In fact, when you're deriving these things it's a good idea to keep a lookout for factors like s, (s + n), etc., and not combine them. They'll be needed later!
 
  • #24
Im stuck now, I out of ideas what to do next. Help!
 
  • #25
After factoring the denominator, use partial fractions to split the expression into two terms. Both terms should have forms that you can recognize in your Transform tables (If they're good tables you will probably also be able to spot an entry for your expression before the partial fraction procedure is done).
 
  • #26
40 / s2 +2s = -8+16s

am i right so far? What you mean by split the expression? which expression ?
 
Last edited:
  • #27
agata78 said:
40 / s2 +2s = -8+16s

am i right?

Nope. You want to use partial fractions on the expression:
$$\frac{40}{s(s + 2)}$$
so
$$\frac{40}{s(s + 2)} = \frac{A}{s} + \frac{B}{s + 2}$$

...carry on...
 
  • #28
I don't know if I am doing that right,

after some calculations i have if s= (-2) then B=-20
and if s = 0 then A= 20

is it ok?
 
  • #29
You've found the correct values for A and B, but I don't recognize your method. Usually one multiplies out the expression on the right and then equates like terms of the numerators on the LHS and RHS to create a pair of equations to find A and B (look up the method of partial fractions).

Nevertheless, since you have values for A and B you now have two expressions in the Laplace domain that you should be able to find in your table of Laplace transforms. Write down their time domain translations; they comprise the terms of the current I(t) that you want.
 
  • #30
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K