Laplace's Equation: Steady-State Temperature in a Rectangular Plate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving Laplace's equation for steady-state temperature distribution in a rectangular metal plate with specified boundary conditions. The plate has dimensions of 10 cm in width and 30 cm in height, with temperatures set at 0° on the long sides and top, and 100° at the base. The solution involves separating variables, leading to the equations X(x) = Bsin(nπx/10) and Y(y) = C sinh(nπy/10) + D sinh(nπ(30-y)/10). The final temperature distribution is expressed as T(x,y) = Σ c_n sinh(nπ(30-y)/10) sin(nπx/10), where c_n are Fourier coefficients determined by the boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation and boundary value problems.
  • Familiarity with separation of variables technique in partial differential equations.
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions, specifically sinh and cosh.
  • Ability to compute Fourier series and coefficients.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables for solving partial differential equations.
  • Learn about hyperbolic functions and their properties in mathematical analysis.
  • Explore Fourier series and their application in solving boundary value problems.
  • Investigate numerical methods for approximating solutions to Laplace's equation.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with heat distribution problems and seeking to understand analytical methods for solving partial differential equations.

mliuzzolino
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long rectangular metal plate has its two long sides and top at 0°. The base is at 100°. The plate's width is 10cm and its height is 30cm. Find the stead-state temperature distribution inside the plate.

Homework Equations



2T = 0

T(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)

X(x) = Acos(kx) + Bsin(kx)
Y(y) = Ceky+De-ky

The Attempt at a Solution



Using boundary conditions to obtain X(x): T(0,y) = T(10,y) = 0

X(x) = Bsin(\dfrac{n\pi x}{10})
Using boundary conditions to obtain Y(y): T(x, 0) = 100; T(x, 30) = 0

Y(0) = C + D = 100

D = 100 - C

Y(30) = Ce^{3n\pi} + De^{-3n\pi} = 0

Ce^{3n\pi} = -De^{-3n\pi}

C = -De^{-6n\pi}

C = -(100 - C)e^{-6n\pi}

C = (C - 100)e^{-6n\pi}

C = Ce^{-6n\pi} - 100e^{-6n\pi}

C - Ce^{-6n\pi} = -100e^{-6n\pi}

C(1 - e^{-6n\pi}) = -100e^{-6n\pi}

C = \dfrac{-100e^{-6n\pi}}{1-e^{-6n\pi}}

C = \dfrac{100e^{-6n\pi}}{e^{-6n\pi} - 1}
Then by D = 100 - C

D = 100 - \dfrac{100e^{-6n\pi}}{e^{-6n\pi} - 1}

D = \dfrac{-100e^{-6n\pi}}{e^{-6n\pi} - 1}
So
Y(y) = \dfrac{100e^{-6n\pi}}{e^{-6n\pi} - 1} (e^{\dfrac{n\pi y}{10}} - e^{\dfrac{-n\pi y}{10}})

Y(y) = \dfrac{200e^{-6n\pi}}{e^{-6n\pi} - 1} sinh(\dfrac{n \pi y}{10})

So by T(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)T(x,y) = B \dfrac{200e^{-6n\pi}}{e^{-6n\pi} - 1} sinh(\dfrac{n \pi y}{10}) sin(\dfrac{n \pi y}{10})

but then...

T(x,y) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} B \dfrac{200e^{-6n\pi}}{e^{-6n\pi} - 1} sinh(\dfrac{n \pi y}{10}) sin(\dfrac{n \pi y}{10})

Up until here, aside from the nastiness of the problem, I decided to read the book and see if I was on track, but they went a completely different way and ended up with something else.

They didn't solve it analytically at all, and just said that we can notice a solution, namely when C = -\dfrac{1}{2}e^{-30k} and when D = \dfrac{1}{2}e^{30k}.

This makes sense to me, and when we analyze the summation and check the condition when T(x,0) = 100, my solution shows that T --> 0 rather than 100.

What did I do wrong, and how do I analytically acquire the solution they achieved? I'm not well versed enough to just pick a solution out of a hat like that, so how could I achieve it along the methods I was using by applying boundary conditions to the Y(y) ODEs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After you have solved the ##X## equation you have eigenfunctions ##X_n(x)=\sin(\frac {n\pi x}{10}x)## and your next step is to solve ##Y''-\frac{n^2\pi^2}{10^2}Y=0## with ##Y(0)=100,\, Y(30)=0##. Frequently in this type of problem it is better to use the {sinh,cosh} family than the exponentials. In particular, I would suggest writing the solution as$$
Y(y) = C\sinh(\frac {n\pi}{10}y)+ D\sinh(\frac {n\pi}{10}(30-y))$$Then using ##Y(30)= 0## immediately tells you ##C=0## so you have ##Y## eigenfunctions$$
Y_n(y) = \sinh(\frac {n\pi}{10}(30-y))$$Now you have the solution$$
T(x,y) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty X_n(x)Y_n(y)=
\sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n \sinh(\frac {n\pi}{10}(30-y))\sin(\frac {n\pi x}{10})$$Now apply your last boundary condition ##T(x,0)=100##:$$
100 = \sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n \sinh(\frac {n\pi}{10}(30))\sin(\frac {n\pi }{10}x)$$Now set ##c_n \sinh(\frac {n\pi}{10}(30))##equal to the Fourier coefficient and it should all work to give you an analytical solution.
 
Thanks for the response!

I understand where the following comes from:
Y'' - \dfrac{n^2 k^2}{10^2}Y = 0

Then we find from it:

Y = Ce^{\dfrac{n \pi y}{10}} + De^{-\dfrac{n \pi y}{10}}

I understand that sinh(x) = \dfrac{1}{2}(e^x - e^{-x}).

However, I don't understand how we can arrives at

Y(y) = C sinh (\dfrac{ n \pi}{10}y) + D sinh ( \dfrac{n \pi}{10} (30 - y))

I think this it the step that I'm completely lost on.
 
sinh(a-y) has an addition formula similar to the trig formula, so it is a linear combination of sinh(y) and cosh(y), which in turn are linear combinations of ##e^y## and ##e^{-y}##. As long as the pair is linearly independent you can use them for the general solution. The pair I have chosen just makes the arithmetic a bit easier.
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
sinh(a-y) has an addition formula similar to the trig formula, so it is a linear combination if sinh(y) and cosh(y), which in turn are linear combinations of ##e^y## and ##e^{-y}##. As long as the pair is linearly independent you can use them for the general solution. The pair I have chosen just makes the arithmetic a bit easier.

I apparently need to familiarize myself more with hyperbolic functions! I should have assumed there was some trick like this. Thanks a lot for your help! It all makes sense now. :)
 
mliuzzolino said:
I apparently need to familiarize myself more with hyperbolic functions! I should have assumed there was some trick like this. Thanks a lot for your help! It all makes sense now. :)

You're welcome. There is one little thing I mis-wrote. I said your ##Y## boundary value problem had ##Y(30)=0## and ##Y(0)= 100##. I shouldn't have included ##Y(0)= 100## at that point because ##100=T(x,0)=X(x)Y(0)## does not imply ##Y(0)= 100##. The nonhomogeneous condition ##100=T(x,0)## was used after the series for ##T(x,y)## was developed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K